[Testing Squad] - February 2010 - Page 2 - maemo.org

Active Topics

Porting apps to Leste (32)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Arno_11 - 4 days, 1 hr ago
[ANNOUNCE] CSSU-thumb thread - stable Thumb2 on N900 (2,264)
to Maemo 5 / Fremantle by panjgoori - 5 days, 20 hrs ago
Full linux distros on Sailfish OS (254)
to SailfishOS by qoh - 6 days, 18 hrs ago
more...

Page 2 of 3

< Prev

Next >

Thread Tools

mikkov	2010-02-12 , 18:46
Posts: 1,208 \| Thanked: 1,028 times \| Joined on Oct 2007	#11

Originally Posted by Sasler

The current version in Extras-testing has some changes that are very minor code-wise, but adds some nice functionality. So I better wait till I can promote it, which is only 3 days more.

I'm still wondering what happened to 5 days 5 votes decision

Quote & Reply |

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mikkov For This Useful Post:
frals, Sasler

	VDVsx	2010-02-12 , 19:36
	Posts: 1,070 \| Thanked: 1,604 times \| Joined on Sep 2008 @ Helsinki	#12

Originally Posted by mikkov

I'm still wondering what happened to 5 days 5 votes decision

After more pondering we didn't reached a final consensus on that, so the current rules will be kept.

__________________
Valério Valério
www.valeriovalerio.org

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to VDVsx For This Useful Post:
frals

	VDVsx	2010-02-14 , 00:09
	Posts: 1,070 \| Thanked: 1,604 times \| Joined on Sep 2008 @ Helsinki	#13

Hi,

here's the list of applications under testing this week.

Week 7:

http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...cs/20070225-2/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...n/2.6-1maemo5/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...ra/20070225-2/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...witcher/0.3.6/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in.../0.9.3-maemo7/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...eragent/0.3.7/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in.../ejpi/0.9.7-1/ - Promoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...eltests/0.1.1/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...apier/1.0.5-3/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in.../0.73-7maemo5/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...ager/0.9.30-1/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...light/0.2.0-2/
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...ilblogg/0.9.0/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...920.2-3maemo1/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...atch-home/0.3/ - Demoted

Results from week 6(2 promoted, 3 demoted):

http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...er/1.0-maemo7/ - Promoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...bledict/0.1-2/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...omeip/1.0.0-4/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...systray/0.0.1/ - Demoted
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...erule/1.0.4-1/ - Promoted

Just two remarks since some have asked:

* The bugtracker field is now mandatory, as you can see by the system notifications, apps without that field can't be promoted to extras, please also check if the field is valid, some developers just put there bugs.maemo.org without a product, e-mail addresses are valid for small apps(themes, widgets,...).
* You don't need to comment if you don't have anything to add to the discussion, for example is someone already commented that the package needs a bugtracker or is not optified, you don't need to repeat the same, just vote down.

I appreciate if someone with time add these two points to the faq(I'll be traveling this week): http://wiki.maemo.org/Testing_Squad

Great job so far.

__________________
Valério Valério
www.valeriovalerio.org

Last edited by VDVsx; 2010-02-20 at 22:56. Reason: updating list

Quote & Reply |

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to VDVsx For This Useful Post:
frals, Texrat, WilliePre

	VDVsx	2010-02-22 , 00:30
	Posts: 1,070 \| Thanked: 1,604 times \| Joined on Sep 2008 @ Helsinki	#14

Hi,

here's the list of applications under testing this week, there's a couple of applications with clear faults/bug that prevent the promotion, these only need your thumb down to be demoted

__________________
Valério Valério
www.valeriovalerio.org

Last edited by VDVsx; 2010-02-25 at 17:28. Reason: fixing links

Quote & Reply |

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to VDVsx For This Useful Post:
frals, Texrat

Sasler	2010-02-22 , 18:32
Posts: 434 \| Thanked: 325 times \| Joined on Sep 2009	#15

When the new firmware (PR1.2) with the Qt 4.6 is released, there is a possibility that current Qt apps don't work well or at all. If I understood correctly, a repacking might be enough. My question is, would it be possible to release updates to these apps, if only repacking was needed, as soon as possible without waiting for the usual 10 days?

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to Sasler For This Useful Post:
VDVsx

slender	2010-02-22 , 18:41
Posts: 2,829 \| Thanked: 1,459 times \| Joined on Dec 2009 @ Finland	#16

VDVsx,
Links broken in last category

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to slender For This Useful Post:
VDVsx

	VDVsx	2010-02-22 , 18:54
	Posts: 1,070 \| Thanked: 1,604 times \| Joined on Sep 2008 @ Helsinki	#17

Originally Posted by slender

VDVsx,
Links broken in last category

Thanks fixed.
Damn copy&paste

__________________
Valério Valério
www.valeriovalerio.org

Last edited by VDVsx; 2010-02-22 at 18:57.

Quote & Reply |

	VDVsx	2010-02-22 , 18:56
	Posts: 1,070 \| Thanked: 1,604 times \| Joined on Sep 2008 @ Helsinki	#18

Originally Posted by Sasler

When the new firmware (PR1.2) with the Qt 4.6 is released, there is a possibility that current Qt apps don't work well or at all. If I understood correctly, a repacking might be enough. My question is, would it be possible to release updates to these apps, if only repacking was needed, as soon as possible without waiting for the usual 10 days?

That's a good question, the current system doesn't allow that(proposed improvements allow), but I'll ask the responsible about that.

__________________
Valério Valério
www.valeriovalerio.org

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to VDVsx For This Useful Post:
Sasler

mikkov	2010-02-24 , 00:13
Posts: 1,208 \| Thanked: 1,028 times \| Joined on Oct 2007	#19

Originally Posted by VDVsx

Hi,

* The bugtracker field is now mandatory, as you can see by the system notifications, apps without that field can't be promoted to extras, please also check if the field is valid, some developers just put there bugs.maemo.org without a product, e-mail addresses are valid for small apps(themes, widgets,...).

Bugtracker link has no real value. IMHO better system would that there is a default bugtracker for all packages (including libraries) and if maintainer wants to use some other bugtracker it can be marked with bugtracker field. Optimally bugzilla would be the default bugtracker, but since bugmaster clearly doesn't want that, packages interface can be used instead.