|
2010-04-12
, 08:44
|
|
Posts: 25 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Chennai,India
|
#12
|
The Following User Says Thank You to arjunkumar87 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-12
, 15:50
|
Posts: 692 |
Thanked: 264 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#13
|
|
2010-04-12
, 15:59
|
Posts: 48 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Castle Rock, CO. USA
|
#14
|
|
2010-04-12
, 16:13
|
Posts: 367 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#15
|
|
2010-04-12
, 16:21
|
Posts: 123 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#16
|
|
2010-04-12
, 16:37
|
Posts: 1,141 |
Thanked: 781 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Magical Unicorn Land
|
#17
|
|
2010-04-12
, 16:40
|
|
Posts: 547 |
Thanked: 461 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ UK
|
#18
|
|
2010-04-12
, 16:48
|
|
Posts: 257 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#19
|
|
2010-04-12
, 16:59
|
|
Posts: 257 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#20
|
By the way, my device is using the XLV/ideal kernel running at [500,850].
So, it's not that the N900 can't open 62+ apps, the task switcher just does a poor job handling them when there's a lot of them. Maybe if we have a different version of the task switcher (maybe a task switcher without the real-time app previews?), we can probably get 100 apps running without a hitch.
jmac.ph