Reply
Thread Tools
rm42's Avatar
Posts: 963 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Connecticut, USA
#11
Originally Posted by Brock View Post
for which company is the graph?
Ah, sorry. Nokia.
__________________
-- Worse than not knowing is not wanting to know! --

http://temporaryland.wordpress.com/
 
Brock's Avatar
Posts: 490 | Thanked: 296 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Hannover-Germany-EU-Earth
#12
Originally Posted by rm42 View Post
Ah, sorry. Nokia.
then i dont understand it, because nokia should be like this

http://www.google.com/finance?q=BIT:NOK1V

now, where can i get the correct stock vlaues for nokia??
 
rm42's Avatar
Posts: 963 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Connecticut, USA
#13
Originally Posted by Brock View Post
then i dont understand it, because nokia should be like this

http://www.google.com/finance?q=BIT:NOK1V

now, where can i get the correct stock vlaues for nokia??
The chart i posted is for New York Stock Exchange. I think the link you posted is for the Borsa Italiana.
__________________
-- Worse than not knowing is not wanting to know! --

http://temporaryland.wordpress.com/
 
Brock's Avatar
Posts: 490 | Thanked: 296 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Hannover-Germany-EU-Earth
#14
Originally Posted by rm42 View Post
The chart i posted is for New York Stock Exchange. I think the link you posted is for the Borsa Italiana.
ah, ok, i understand, thank you.
 
Posts: 1,341 | Thanked: 708 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#15
Explain please, why anyone would use Qt with commercial license when there is LGPL available?

Oh, ok, for WP-platform where OSS-license is forbidden.

Then, wait...why Nokia sold it? It doesn't believe itself either WP-ecosystem will ever be something?
 
rm42's Avatar
Posts: 963 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Connecticut, USA
#16
Originally Posted by zimon View Post
Explain please, why anyone would use Qt with commercial license when there is LGPL available?

Oh, ok, for WP-platform where OSS-license is forbidden.

Then, wait...why Nokia sold it? It doesn't believe itself either WP-ecosystem will ever be something?
The did not sell it. They just made a deal with Digia to run their licensing side of the business. Nokia still owns the Qt copy rights and trademarks. Also, remember that Qt is used on the desktop as well. Some companies may want the commercial license of Qt for that.
__________________
-- Worse than not knowing is not wanting to know! --

http://temporaryland.wordpress.com/
 
Posts: 235 | Thanked: 339 times | Joined on Nov 2010
#17
Originally Posted by zimon View Post
Explain please, why anyone would use Qt with commercial license when there is LGPL available?

Oh, ok, for WP-platform where OSS-license is forbidden.
Even if Microsoft allowed you to use C++ (Managed code only, AFAIK) on WP7, they certainly do not allow the use of another toolkit other than their own
 
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#18
Near as I can tell at this rate, the Android platform would be what might make Qt come alive, more than anything else. Good luck, Qt. Oh the lost opportunities Nokia represents these days. Ugh.
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
 

The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#19
Originally Posted by zimon View Post
Explain please, why anyone would use Qt with commercial license when there is LGPL available?
Zero questions and a paper trail for your lawyers.
 
qgil's Avatar
Posts: 3,105 | Thanked: 11,088 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Mountain View (CA, USA)
#20
Originally Posted by zimon View Post
Explain please, why anyone would use Qt with commercial license when there is LGPL available?
Some companies have modifications to the Qt libraries that for some reason don't want to share. It is also a case that Qt is used in a fully proprietary product, and paying the commercial license saves you from learning about the LGPL licensing implications, setup the availability of sources, etc. In other cases the commercial agreement comes with a support package that was just convenient to sign or renew.

Last edited by qgil; 2011-03-08 at 00:13.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
nokia defiled, strickn2thegrnd


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:13.