Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Banned | Posts: 3,412 | Thanked: 1,043 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#21
Originally Posted by Bernard View Post
A bit difficult, since I haven't used it. But I think it does look very nice.
Is that praise enough?
HAHA your brave but you need to go a little further than that .


Originally Posted by Bernard View Post
From his presentations he appears to me a very rational man actually.
He is most certainly that as he has the gift of the gab and what it takes to lead a company by the balls and his selling techniques to his staff are second to none, thats why he is CEO.

Originally Posted by Bernard View Post
Like I said in my first post in this topic, it is a big gamble. But so was continuing the symbian/meego strategy. Delays in mobile software development of 10 months are a killer when it comes to competitiveness. And gambling that Nokia could fix their software development process and even catch-up 10 months is arguably a bigger gamble.
Nokia was falling flat on its face with software development and it was so clear to see, if you look at there past it got steadily worse from 06 onwards, that means the software development was falling apart at the seams especially Maemo and meego but i do not know why, that part is a mystery to me.

They had to do something or sell up and go home, now we have the venture just sit back and enjoy the show.

10 months is a killer to those who wait for products, i don't now as i got burnt with the N900.
 
marxian's Avatar
Posts: 2,448 | Thanked: 9,523 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Wigan, UK
#22
The Nokia board may as well have walked into a casino and bet the company on red. That would probably have been a safer gamble, as my guess is that the probability of success under the current strategy is less than 0.5. Unlike the spinning of a roulette wheel, this is not some kind of independent Bernoulli trial where the previous results don't matter.

And now the end is near
And so we face the final curtain
My friend I'll say it clear
MeeGo is dead of that I'm certain

And so we went with Windoze Phone
Because Steve Ballmer had his say
And more, much more than this
We did it his way.


His Way by S.Elop
__________________
'Men of high position are allowed, by a special act of grace, to accomodate their reasoning to the answer they need. Logic is only required in those of lesser rank.' - J K Galbraith

My website

GitHub
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to marxian For This Useful Post:
Banned | Posts: 3,412 | Thanked: 1,043 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#23
Originally Posted by marxian View Post
The Nokia board may as well have walked into a casino and bet the company on red. That would probably have been a safer gamble, as my guess is that the probability of success under the current strategy is less than 0.5. Unlike the spinning of a roulette wheel, this is not some kind of independent Bernoulli trial where the previous results don't matter.

And now the end is near
And so we face the final curtain
My friend I'll say it clear
MeeGo is dead of that I'm certain

And so we went with Windoze Phone
Because Steve Ballmer had his say
And more, much more than this
We did it his way.


His Way by S.Elop
BAAAAA your just plain MADDD you are .
 
Daneel's Avatar
Posts: 549 | Thanked: 698 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#24
Originally Posted by marxian View Post
The Nokia board may as well have walked into a casino and bet the company on red. That would probably have been a safer gamble, as my guess is that the probability of success under the current strategy is less than 0.5. Unlike the spinning of a roulette wheel, this is not some kind of independent Bernoulli trial where the previous results don't matter.

And now the end is near
And so we face the final curtain
My friend I'll say it clear
MeeGo is dead of that I'm certain

And so we went with Windoze Phone
Because Steve Ballmer had his say
And more, much more than this
We did it his way.


His Way by S.Elop
Cute

.......
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Daneel For This Useful Post:
Posts: 468 | Thanked: 610 times | Joined on Jun 2006
#25
Originally Posted by abill_uk View Post
HAHA your brave but you need to go a little further than that .
maybe in the future, but WP is a bit of a problem for me since I don't use Windows on my desktop anymore, and use very few Microsoft web services (hotmail mostly). So that would make a WP a very stand-alone device for me. I tried modern versions of most of the other os-es (iPod touch, Palm Pre 2, Nokia C7, Samsung GS2), so I think eventually I will also try WP (they are rather affordable actually ).


Originally Posted by abill_uk View Post
Nokia was falling flat on its face with software development and it was so clear to see, if you look at there past it got steadily worse from 06 onwards, that means the software development was falling apart at the seams especially Maemo and meego but i do not know why, that part is a mystery to me.

They had to do something or sell up and go home, now we have the venture just sit back and enjoy the show.

10 months is a killer to those who wait for products, i don't now as i got burnt with the N900.
The smartphone world has changed. Focus today is on software not hardware, and Nokia needed to switch focus and compete with long-term software-companies IN software development.
That isn't easy at all. Could Nokia have done better or even succeed? Maybe, probably, who knows. It doesn't matter.
I totally agree with an old arstechnica article that adopting WP is Nokia deciding it could not compete in software: Capitulation.
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/...y-platform.ars
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Bernard For This Useful Post:
Banned | Posts: 3,412 | Thanked: 1,043 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#26
Originally Posted by Bernard View Post
The smartphone world has changed. Focus today is on software not hardware, and Nokia needed to switch focus and compete with long-term software-companies IN software development.
That isn't easy at all. Could Nokia have done better or even succeed? Maybe, probably, who knows. It doesn't matter.
I totally agree with an old arstechnica article that adopting WP is Nokia deciding it could not compete in software: Capitulation.
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/...y-platform.ars
The way Nokia was going they had totally lost it in the end with Maemo and i do not think they had any hope left of even producing software in house and i really do not understand why this happened but it was a clear move with Microsoft as a last chance effort i think before selling up.

WP may well be windows based or as marxian says wondoze ha but it is certainly going to open a few doors no matter which way you look at it and most probably will be a market breaker, it has to be to save Nokia.

Elop IS a damm good manager and i am sure if it were not for the fact he wants WP he would be very liked on here if he had stayed with Maemo and meego.

I can not really complain of Microsoft because they have earned me more money than i could even hazard a guess at and i am sure WP will also be an engineers delight so for me i really will just sit back watch and wait, see where it goes and let's face it we do not have any choices.
 
Posts: 468 | Thanked: 610 times | Joined on Jun 2006
#27
Originally Posted by abill_uk View Post
I can not really complain of Microsoft because they have earned me more money than i could even hazard a guess at and i am sure WP will also be an engineers delight so for me i really will just sit back watch and wait, see where it goes and let's face it we do not have any choices.
Everybody does have a choice. The mobile space is vast, and still has lot of different players. Just because Nokia decides to make WP phones, doesn't mean you have to buy them.
From what I read, development for WP is rather restrictive. But if you are an experienced silverlight or xna developer it may very well be "a delight".
I don't know, I'm not
Development for WP7 requires a Windows PC. A virtual machine does not work, so that makes it even more hassle to try it for me.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Bernard For This Useful Post:
Posts: 468 | Thanked: 610 times | Joined on Jun 2006
#28
LOL. We talk about Nokia having management troubles, but HP seems to be FAR worse:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/22/bu...pagewanted=all

absolutely mind-boggling
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bernard For This Useful Post:
Daneel's Avatar
Posts: 549 | Thanked: 698 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#29
With all the giants dying the future looks monipolistic, reminds me of how in "The Demolition man" the one and only restaurant was taco bell.
Who will be the taco bell of the IT industry?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Daneel For This Useful Post:
Banned | Posts: 706 | Thanked: 296 times | Joined on May 2010
#30
Who cares? CTOs come and go. Its the final product that matters.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:54.