|
2009-12-15
, 15:53
|
Posts: 36 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#32
|
Welll... the accelero picks up acceleration, not velocity. Ideally acceleration is zero through the whole "journey". Since the accelerometer is inside (and fixed to) a heavier body it in fact suffers "accelerations" from within the phone itself (like when it is spinning) but that is very noisy...
|
2009-12-15
, 16:02
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#33
|
Comming back to the acceleration thing. Assuming that the phone does not rotate, why should be the acceleration constant to zero? I think RDJEHV was right. It is the rate of change of the velocity. If you throw your phone straight into the air, it gets slower and slower, until it reaches its highest point. There the acceleration should be zero, i.e. for a moment the phone is weightless. That is precisely what happens during a parabolic flight http://www.experiencezerog.com/parabolic.cfm
|
2009-12-15
, 16:13
|
Posts: 112 |
Thanked: 122 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ London, United Kingdom
|
#34
|
Umm, no. The acceleration will be constant - 1G. What other force is acting on the phone in mid air? A parabolic flight doesn't actually experience zero-gee, it just feels like it - the plane is actually accelerating downwards at 1G.
|
2009-12-15
, 19:27
|
Posts: 654 |
Thanked: 664 times |
Joined on Feb 2009
@ Germany
|
#35
|
|
2009-12-15
, 19:32
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#36
|
|
2009-12-15
, 20:02
|
Posts: 308 |
Thanked: 118 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ UK Swindon
|
#37
|
|
2009-12-15
, 20:07
|
|
Posts: 635 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Black Mesa Research Facility
|
#38
|
|
2009-12-15
, 23:02
|
Posts: 53 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
|
#40
|
Now. about measuring the 'hardness' of landing, it is totally plausible! I also had that idea.. but well.. maybe for v.2...
Another things in mind are:
Happy n900 owner!
Check my apps: n900fly, accdisplay and the "desktop command execution" widget!
Last edited by cpscotti; 2009-12-15 at 15:41. Reason: typo