Active Topics

 



Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 130 | Thanked: 9 times | Joined on Jul 2010
#41
id love to see this in the repos, with the stock kernel and backup pulseaudio option


keep it up man!!!
 
Posts: 650 | Thanked: 619 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#42
Briefly tried the packages. Seem to me the stuttering is improved but under heavy loading (HAM running, Ovi Map running, open a couple of web pages) still happened. I guess need to try it out for several days.

Btw, PulseAudio constantly takes about 10% CPU usage during audio playback. If my memory is correct, this is about the same as the stock PulseAudio pacakge in PR1.2.
 
Posts: 74 | Thanked: 34 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#43
installed and is working fine so far
 
Posts: 650 | Thanked: 619 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#44
Hi MohammadAG,

I tried it further today and unfortunately I don't think the patch is much more robust than stock pulseaudio.

I sometimes get stuttering when Modest (running Nokia Messaging only) displays email notification. The patch is marginally better but I still have stuttering. Besides, checking update through both FAP and HAM could make music pause. I don't think this happens to the stock one. So don't think the patch is robust in terms of performance improvement. I'm getting the feeling it's not the implementation of data structure that caused the stuttering.

Will unpin and double check how stock one behaves.
 
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#45
Originally Posted by joerg_rw View Post
It's no tarball, it's a gzip file, as you can tell from *.gz
Afaik messybox tar doesn't know how to implicitly invoke unzip
It does, that's not the problem. It looks like a funky tarball to me:

Code:
00000000  6c 69 62 70 75 6c 73 65  2d 6d 61 69 6e 6c 6f 6f  |libpulse-mainloo|
00000010  70 2d 67 6c 69 62 30 5f  30 2e 39 2e 31 35 2d 31  |p-glib0_0.9.15-1|
00000020  6d 61 65 6d 6f 33 38 2b  30 6d 35 5f 61 72 6d 65  |maemo38+0m5_arme|
00000030  6c 2e 64 65 62 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |l.deb...........|
00000040  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
00000050  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
00000060  00 00 00 00 30 30 30 30  36 34 34 00 80 00 00 00  |....0000644.....|
00000070  00 a6 f8 00 32 30 33 30  31 36 37 00 30 30 30 30  |....2030167.0000|
00000080  30 30 34 37 37 35 30 00  31 31 34 33 33 34 37 36  |0047750.11433476|
The red bit is the uid field and it's supposed to be an octal number represented in ASCII digits. It also uses ASCII encoding for other numeric fields such as gid (blue) and even size (green) which is just weird.

According to tar(5) this is a non-standard / obsolete variation:

Other Extensions
One common extension, utilized by GNU tar, star, and other newer tar
implementations, permits binary numbers in the standard numeric fields.
This is flagged by setting the high bit of the first character. This
permits 95-bit values for the length and time fields and 63-bit values
for the uid, gid, and device numbers. GNU tar supports this extension
for the length, mtime, ctime, and atime fields. Joerg Schilling's star
program supports this extension for all numeric fields. Note that this
extension is largely obsoleted by the extended attribute record provided
by the pax interchange format.
I'd be curious to know what software produced this (in the interests of avoiding it, you understand). FWIW I can't reproduce this type of output with any gtar --format / star -H / bsdtar --format options.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post:
Posts: 309 | Thanked: 456 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#46
Tried it out, working stable so far. Still get issues with skip or stutter using FM Radio App but everything else seems a bit better.
 
Posts: 61 | Thanked: 30 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Madrid, Spain
#47
Installed and pinned, so far no stuttering.

The volume seems to be a bit louder, as someone else already commented..

Thanks a lot for your continued support, MohammadAG!!!!

Rgds,
 
Posts: 958 | Thanked: 483 times | Joined on May 2010
#48
question: when pr1.3 is released, do i have to remember to unpin this?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to droll For This Useful Post:
Posts: 47 | Thanked: 32 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#49
I installed this and the hildon fix you posted... Both seem to work great however something (and I'm unsure exactly what) seems to have stopped my phone from vibrating and ringing when it is unlocked. Has anyone else experienced this?
 
Posts: 133 | Thanked: 138 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#50
Originally Posted by llBlackenedll View Post
I installed this and the hildon fix you posted... Both seem to work great however something (and I'm unsure exactly what) seems to have stopped my phone from vibrating and ringing when it is unlocked. Has anyone else experienced this?
I have experienced similar behaviour after installing this package and the 'faster menu scolling' fix:
- Notification sounds/vibrating doesn't always happen when receiving calls, emails, sms etc
- Instead of my custom notification sounds I sometimes get the default notification sounds

Uninstalling the pulseaudio package (using apt-get upgrade) seems to have solved this problem.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:57.