Reply
Thread Tools
misterc's Avatar
Posts: 1,625 | Thanked: 998 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#5511
Originally Posted by kanishou View Post
The way to make money with Open Source is to incorporate it into products, which is why hardware makers are indeed a driving force behind Open Source development.

True "Open Source companies" generally sell their services and development resources to such hardware makers. Such as mine and quite a few others who develop software for Nokia, in addition to their internal software teams.

It is a common mistake to believe, that software companies are legit only if they make their money from selling or otherwise monetizing software.

The bottom line is, people and companies make money from Open Source software.
neither redhat nor Novell are hardware companies.
they are the two leading (commercial) /Linux distributions.
 
Posts: 1,298 | Thanked: 2,277 times | Joined on May 2011
#5512
Novell is no more.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to shmerl For This Useful Post:
misterc's Avatar
Posts: 1,625 | Thanked: 998 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#5513
Originally Posted by erendorn View Post
Yes, if you "sell something" by opposition as "not sell something because the whole package is too expensive", you actually make money. But if you know better, talk to IBM, I'm sure their model is crap and they want to change it.

Nokia contribution didn't seem to help them that much, and funnily enough, they dropped it.
so don't you think IBM would be happier (= making more money) without open source GNU/Linux?
 
erendorn's Avatar
Posts: 738 | Thanked: 983 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ London
#5514
Originally Posted by misterc View Post
neither redhat nor Novell are hardware companies.
they are the two leading (commercial) /Linux distributions.
He is absolutely not saying the contrary.
He is saying: "Some hardware companies make money from open source".
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to erendorn For This Useful Post:
Posts: 75 | Thanked: 112 times | Joined on Apr 2011
#5515
Nokia don't contribute to linux to make money. They hate money, all they care about is connecting people. Boot your phone and see for yourself.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to uppercase For This Useful Post:
misterc's Avatar
Posts: 1,625 | Thanked: 998 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#5516
 
erendorn's Avatar
Posts: 738 | Thanked: 983 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ London
#5517
Originally Posted by misterc View Post
so don't you think IBM would be happier (= making more money) without open source GNU/Linux?
No I don't think so. It would have less customer, or would need to spend more on development, or would have to share it's margins with a software company.
Either way, it's less money.

Last edited by erendorn; 2011-06-17 at 21:58.
 
misterc's Avatar
Posts: 1,625 | Thanked: 998 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#5518
Originally Posted by uppercase View Post
Nokia don't contribute to linux to make money. They hate money, all they care about is connecting people. Boot your phone and see for yourself.
can't do;
deleted the AVI file >¦-)
 

The Following User Says Thank You to misterc For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,298 | Thanked: 2,277 times | Joined on May 2011
#5520
I mean the original company. If it'd be so healthy - they wouldn't sell themselves. At least hopefully SUSE/OpenSUSE will continue to be active.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to shmerl For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
duke nukem4eva, epic!, harmattan, n-950, nokia diamond, non-believers, rm680, wasteland


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:02.