Reply
Thread Tools
Daneel's Avatar
Posts: 549 | Thanked: 698 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#61
This reminded me of a few futuristic movies i've seen (Alien) where the world is run by corporations and not governments, its probably like that already, just not so public
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Daneel For This Useful Post:
Posts: 670 | Thanked: 747 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
#62
@oweng: I wouldn't have started this thread if I didn't believe a M$ buyout was a real possibility. Now I think it's more likely than not.

@Daneel: That happened a long time ago, at least in the US.
__________________
Registered Linux user #266531.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Crashdamage For This Useful Post:
dumpystig's Avatar
Posts: 464 | Thanked: 338 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ UK, Northwest
#63
Originally Posted by Crashdamage View Post
Just curious if you think the Google/Motorola deal will put pressure on Microsoft to actually buy Nokia instead of just controlling it.
Does anyone really, I mean honestly, give a ****?
 
Posts: 670 | Thanked: 747 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
#64
Originally Posted by dumpystig View Post
Does anyone really, I mean honestly, give a ****?
Other than the impact to employees and their families, no I don't - except that all these mergers, acquisitions, partnerships and patent wars will ultimately determine what devices I will have to choose from and what operating systems they run. I DO care about that!
__________________
Registered Linux user #266531.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Crashdamage For This Useful Post:
Posts: 18 | Thanked: 18 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#65
Nokia was already getting primed to be sold. Elop has already sold or in the process of selling software assets in the form of Symbian and QT. This makes Nokia very attractive as a pure hardware manufacturer to be sold for its patent portfolio.
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to prana For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#66
Originally Posted by prana View Post
Nokia was already getting primed to be sold. Elop has already sold or in the process of selling software assets in the form of Symbian and QT. This makes Nokia very attractive as a pure hardware manufacturer to be sold for its patent portfolio.
Good point. I saw this happen at Texas Instruments not long before our division was sold to Raytheon.

EDIT: oh, and here's a logo that got a laugh from me last year--


__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net

Last edited by Texrat; 2011-08-16 at 13:31.
 

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
Banned | Posts: 974 | Thanked: 622 times | Joined on Oct 2010
#67
Originally Posted by prana View Post
Nokia was already getting primed to be sold. Elop has already sold or in the process of selling software assets in the form of Symbian and QT. This makes Nokia very attractive as a pure hardware manufacturer to be sold for its patent portfolio.
So you see the signs Does this also include news from Microsoft that they have no plans of purchasing Nokia? No? Thought so.
 
Daneel's Avatar
Posts: 549 | Thanked: 698 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#68
Originally Posted by ericsson View Post
So you see the signs Does this also include news from Microsoft that they have no plans of purchasing Nokia? No? Thought so.
Oh yea, they are going to publicly announce that they have plans to buy Nokia thus inflating the price of the stocks tenfold.

The US government should hire you to fix their debt, you seem really clever.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Daneel For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#69
Originally Posted by ericsson View Post
So you see the signs Does this also include news from Microsoft that they have no plans of purchasing Nokia? No? Thought so.
Actually both have issued denials, but I know from direct personal experience that those sorts of denials mean nothing.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net

Last edited by Texrat; 2011-08-16 at 15:08. Reason: clarified
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
shallimus's Avatar
Posts: 568 | Thanked: 969 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Toronto
#70
Originally Posted by Rauha View Post
Not sure there is anybody else out there that both could and would.

Google paid +60% over market cap for Motorola. That would make Nokia, even with post Elopcalypse share prices, very expensive purchase. 30 billion or more in Dollars. Very few corporations could afford that price. Most that could do not have any need for Nokia.
Question 1

Who:
  • at one point recently had greater cash reserves than the US federal government?
  • is fighting mobile tech patent lawsuits currently?
  • has had to settle patent lawsuits with Nokia before?
  • is a direct competitor of Microsoft and will be seeking to keep all MSFT mobile efforts down?

Answers on an ultra-thin, shiny and wickedly overpriced postcard please.
__________________
tinfoilhat.dll: Trojan horse detected
Sailfish want list: calendar bugfixes, glanceable agenda, Swype or similar
Evolution continues (but we're still pre-Cambrian)

 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shallimus For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
gogle-mogle, google motorola, motogoogle, motogrogle, never say never


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:55.