Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (5)
to General by teroyk - 2 days, 12 hrs ago -
Extra softwares in Sailfish using CLI, repositories, etc (118)
to SailfishOS by nieldk - 2 days, 17 hrs ago -
Paths (0)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 3 days, 15 hrs ago - more...
|
2010-05-04
, 15:57
|
|
Posts: 1,667 |
Thanked: 561 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#32
|
Do we have any HK users on this forum?
|
|
2010-05-04
, 16:05
|
|
Posts: 99 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#33
|
Originally Posted by nosa101
Calling all HK N900 owners!!
Do we have any HK users on this forum?
Would be useful to see if they can compare bug reports from the leaked version to their HK version.
|
|
2010-05-04
, 16:12
|
|
Posts: 99 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#34
|
Originally Posted by depu
sorry, think we might have crossed wires.
@SirMuttley
If you see he is shown the HK and UK and USA and the MENA releases. And even then it is showing a version which is older than that one which got leaked earlier.
Either ways we all know that this probably is not the version being released to the rest of the world either.
The version on all the screenshots from HK N900s is 2010.12-9.
However the version for HK shown in screenshot in the original post is an older firmware.
Why Nokia aren't releasing the version that comes with HK N900 is unknown, my guess is they wanted to wait for the global release of PR1.2 first, however this does present issues should a HK owner wish to reflash their device.
Interestingly though, Nokia Software Updater should let you flash your device based on your firmware region. So if anyone has a spare N900 they don't mind bricking they could flash the HK firmware available for download (as seen in OP's screenshot) and then see if NSU will update it to PR1.2. If anyone has the balls to try it do let us know how you get on
|
|
2010-05-04
, 16:30
|
|
Posts: 99 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#35
|
Damn it's confusing when threads get merged like that.
And I have to say that thread about the HK Firmware was really mostly about the HK firmware and not the leaked one.
Nevermind.
And I have to say that thread about the HK Firmware was really mostly about the HK firmware and not the leaked one.
Nevermind.
 |
|
2010-05-04
, 16:34
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#36
|
Originally Posted by SirMuttley
Yeah, I'm hoping to get clarity on how that should be handled. Different moderators appear to have different opinions on thread management and that's not helpful to you guys for sure.
Damn it's confusing when threads get merged like that.
And I have to say that thread about the HK Firmware was really mostly about the HK firmware and not the leaked one.
Nevermind.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
| The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-05-04
, 16:50
|
|
Posts: 99 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#37
|
Originally Posted by ossipena
Changing the file name wouldn't also change the version shown in the "About Product" screen.
where did that come from?
sorry that i speculate about ugly truth but tell me how you can know leaked fw is 12-9? if there are nothing to compare to, all you have is the filename and that isn't so hard to change, is it?
However this doesn't mean someone hasn't disassembled the firmware and changed it and reassembled it. A bit more involved than renaming the file, but not impossible.
| The Following User Says Thank You to SirMuttley For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2010-05-04
, 16:52
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#38
|
Originally Posted by SirMuttley
how exactly?
I'm not too sure what you guys are actually arguing for but you can at least narrow a build down to a week of the year.
unless things have changed recently, one can only speculate dates with ~+2-0 months error margin.
someone told me to use common sense but it appears there was no point in it.....
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
|
|
2010-05-04
, 16:55
|
|
Posts: 99 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#39
|
Originally Posted by ossipena
As I understand it the version number is:
how exactly?
unless things have changed recently, one can only speculate dates with ~+2-0 months error margin.
someone told me to use common sense but it appears there was no point in it.....
Year . Week - Build
So 2010.12-9 would be the 9th build in Week 12 of 2010.
That is how, I believe, you can narrow it down to a week.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SirMuttley For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-05-04
, 17:09
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#40
|
Originally Posted by SirMuttley
so we have no idea how things really are. I've seen earlier explanation: week of base build - build
As I understand it the version number is:
Year . Week - Build
So 2010.12-9 would be the 9th build in Week 12 of 2010.
That is how, I believe, you can narrow it down to a week.
e: that came from qgil if I remember correctly
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
Last edited by ossipena; 2010-05-04 at 17:12.
Happy?
Now can we proceed with civilized discussion minus conspiracy theories.