|
2009-11-11
, 22:18
|
|
Posts: 1,028 |
Thanked: 578 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
@ Chicago
|
#2
|
How good is Maemo/N900 really?
|
2009-11-11
, 22:25
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#3
|
|
2009-11-11
, 22:26
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#4
|
So Android sounds like a cool alternative. A year ago it was still too young and new, but now, there are some really nice Android phones on the market. Or about to appear on the market. The Motorola Milestone sounds absolutely brilliant, as does the Xperia X10. But the Xperia isn't available yet, and the Milestone comes with a QWERTZ keyboard rather than a QWERTY one, and who knows how long before a Dutch version appears? And is it really completely open? I read somewhere that you still need to pull some trickery in order to become root on your own machine.
And then I discover the N900 and Maemo, and it sounds like everything the others aren't. For one thing, Nokia seems to be the only manufacturer who really seems to get the point that a high-end smartphone isn't a phone anymore, but a pocket computer.
But the N900 with Maemo really as good as the others? I don't doubt it's theoretically more powerful, but does it have a similar selection of quality apps? Does it have the hardware to support that range of apps (like a digital compass)? Android has 10,000 apps, and the iPhone has 100,000. Now most of those are crap, so big numbers aren't all that important, but does Maemo really offer the same kind of apps as the better iPhone and Android? Is it as easy to develop for as Android is rumoured to be? Does it have an official app store that offers app developers a financial incentive to produce quality apps?
And then there's the resistive touch screen and the stylus. Isn't that yesterday's technology? Shouldn't it have capacitive touch and multitouch?
Then again, Maemo also seems to have a smart, active and dedicated community, and that's worth something too.
|
2009-11-11
, 22:30
|
|
Posts: 963 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Connecticut, USA
|
#5
|
But the N900 with Maemo really as good as the others? I don't doubt it's theoretically more powerful, but does it have a similar selection of quality apps? Does it have the hardware to support that range of apps (like a digital compass)? Android has 10,000 apps, and the iPhone has 100,000. Now most of those are crap, so big numbers aren't all that important, but does Maemo really offer the same kind of apps as the better iPhone and Android? Is it as easy to develop for as Android is rumoured to be? Does it have an official app store that offers app developers a financial incentive to produce quality apps?
And then there's the resistive touch screen and the stylus. Isn't that yesterday's technology? Shouldn't it have capacitive touch and multitouch?
It seems to me that the N900, great though in some hardware areas, is lacking a bit in other areas. I'm also afraid I'll end up with a bare Linux desktop rather than a smooth and slick smartphone with lots of cool apps accessible with only a single click. (I don't want to browse through menus to find the app I want.)
Then again, Maemo also seems to have a smart, active and dedicated community, and that's worth something too.
|
2009-11-11
, 22:30
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#6
|
Nokia seems to be the only manufacturer who really seems to get the point that a high-end smartphone isn't a phone anymore, but a pocket computer.
Is it as easy to develop for as Android is rumoured to be
Does it have an official app store that offers app developers a financial incentive to produce quality apps?
And then there's the resistive touch screen and the stylus. Isn't that yesterday's technology? Shouldn't it have capacitive touch and multitouch?
I'm also afraid I'll end up with a bare Linux desktop rather than a smooth and slick smartphone with lots of cool apps accessible with only a single click. (I don't want to browse through menus to find the app I want.)
|
2009-11-11
, 22:34
|
Posts: 521 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#7
|
|
2009-11-11
, 22:38
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#8
|
|
2009-11-11
, 22:45
|
Posts: 12 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ San Francisco, CA
|
#9
|
But the N900 with Maemo really as good as the others? I don't doubt it's theoretically more powerful, but does it have a similar selection of quality apps? Does it have the hardware to support that range of apps (like a digital compass)? Android has 10,000 apps, and the iPhone has 100,000. Now most of those are crap, so big numbers aren't all that important, but does Maemo really offer the same kind of apps as the better iPhone and Android? Is it as easy to develop for as Android is rumoured to be? Does it have an official app store that offers app developers a financial incentive to produce quality apps?
And then there's the resistive touch screen and the stylus. Isn't that yesterday's technology? Shouldn't it have capacitive touch and multitouch?
It seems to me that the N900, great though in some hardware areas, is lacking a bit in other areas. I'm also afraid I'll end up with a bare Linux desktop rather than a smooth and slick smartphone with lots of cool apps accessible with only a single click. (I don't want to browse through menus to find the app I want.)
|
2009-11-11
, 22:48
|
|
Posts: 445 |
Thanked: 572 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford
|
#10
|
And then there's the resistive touch screen and the stylus. Isn't that yesterday's technology? Shouldn't it have capacitive touch and multitouch?.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ewan For This Useful Post: | ||
But the iPhone is way too locked down. Apple is the big gatekeeper that decides what I can and can't do with my pocket computer, and that sucks. I want tethering, Google Voice, buying from alternative app stores, and improve existing apps.
So Android sounds like a cool alternative. A year ago it was still too young and new, but now, there are some really nice Android phones on the market. Or about to appear on the market. The Motorola Milestone sounds absolutely brilliant, as does the Xperia X10. But the Xperia isn't available yet, and the Milestone comes with a QWERTZ keyboard rather than a QWERTY one, and who knows how long before a Dutch version appears? And is it really completely open? I read somewhere that you still need to pull some trickery in order to become root on your own machine.
And then I discover the N900 and Maemo, and it sounds like everything the others aren't. For one thing, Nokia seems to be the only manufacturer who really seems to get the point that a high-end smartphone isn't a phone anymore, but a pocket computer.
But the N900 with Maemo really as good as the others? I don't doubt it's theoretically more powerful, but does it have a similar selection of quality apps? Does it have the hardware to support that range of apps (like a digital compass)? Android has 10,000 apps, and the iPhone has 100,000. Now most of those are crap, so big numbers aren't all that important, but does Maemo really offer the same kind of apps as the better iPhone and Android? Is it as easy to develop for as Android is rumoured to be? Does it have an official app store that offers app developers a financial incentive to produce quality apps?
And then there's the resistive touch screen and the stylus. Isn't that yesterday's technology? Shouldn't it have capacitive touch and multitouch?
It seems to me that the N900, great though in some hardware areas, is lacking a bit in other areas. I'm also afraid I'll end up with a bare Linux desktop rather than a smooth and slick smartphone with lots of cool apps accessible with only a single click. (I don't want to browse through menus to find the app I want.)
Then again, Maemo also seems to have a smart, active and dedicated community, and that's worth something too.