|
2012-04-22
, 08:35
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Apr 2011
|
#12
|
|
2012-04-22
, 08:42
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Apr 2011
|
#13
|
3.5G (or any cellular data connections) weren't built for low latency. 200-400ms sounds like a fair expectation for 3 or 3.5G. 4G and LTE or whatever they call it these days *may* have lower latency.
Speed does not always correlate with latency. You can have a 10mbps connection with high latency, or a 56k connection with low latency (like 20ms pings on average)
|
2012-04-22
, 09:26
|
Posts: 131 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#14
|
|
2012-04-23
, 01:38
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#15
|
Not BS, I have witnesses to it, it was inside the Cinema complex Crawley, UK and it showed 3.9G on the status bar.
I can only report what it said, I am not able to judge what it meant.
rgds
|
2012-04-23
, 01:55
|
|
Posts: 566 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Lower Saxony
|
#16
|
|
2012-04-23
, 02:02
|
Posts: 1,523 |
Thanked: 1,997 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ not your mom's FOSS basement
|
#17
|
I'm pretty sure the N900's radio is HSPA (3.5G)
N9 PR 1.3 Open Mode + kernel-plus for Harmattan
@kenweknot, working on Glacier for Nemo.