Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
qwerty12's Avatar
Posts: 4,274 | Thanked: 5,358 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Looking at y'all and sighing
#1
Midori 0.14 is in diablo extras-devel and attached here. I use Bundyo's webkit fine with this. Midori 0.14 is the last version that will compile for diablo.

Fixes by me:
  • Use hildon file choosers
  • Bind (properly) fullscreen and zoom keys
  • Osso init so it doesn't get killed
  • Remove the double Midori from the title.



Diff: http://repository.maemo.org/extras-d...ource/m/midori
Attached Files
File Type: deb midori_0.1.4-1maemo1_armel.deb (334.6 KB, 247 views)
 

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to qwerty12 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 609 | Thanked: 232 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ the end of my rope
#2
Can someone who has used both midori and tear compare them briefly? Thanks.
__________________
Maemofo
 
qwerty12's Avatar
Posts: 4,274 | Thanked: 5,358 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Looking at y'all and sighing
#3
I prefer Tear personally, built for the tablet etc but Midori supports tabs, for instance, but Midori has no support for downloading but Tear does.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to qwerty12 For This Useful Post:
munky261's Avatar
Posts: 1,674 | Thanked: 171 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Anderson, IN
#4
Ill have to second qwerty12 on that. Tear is the best browser for the tablets Ive tried so far...very few problems at all.
__________________
There is only one Return, and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
 
Posts: 104 | Thanked: 20 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ Illinois
#5
When I installed Tear, I was hoping I could uninstall Microb to have more space. But Tear's bookmarks management stinks and I can't figure out how to set the homepage and also on Microb I had it so the toolbar dissappears on fullscreen but Tear can't do that. Wait, I just checked and I can't uninstall Microb. 14 mb or whatever it was seems a lot of space for a browser I only use half the time. It does load a lot of pages faster and the scrolling isn't as frustrating though. Are webkit browsers supposed to be faster? I am surprised at all the browser options popping up lately and have only tried Tear and Microb
 
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#6
I prefer Midori so far. It just works better for me.
 
Posts: 161 | Thanked: 99 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#7
Originally Posted by blowfish23 View Post
Are webkit browsers supposed to be faster?
In my experience they are faster on many pages. Mostly on pages with many ads microb (with Adblock Plus and Flashblock enabled) is still faster. Way faster in some cases. But that's not a shortcoming of the Webkit engine.

Once somebody comes up with proper ad blocking features for Midori/Tear this should also improve.
 
Posts: 99 | Thanked: 25 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ shanghai , China
#8
on my N810 , midori is more stayable than tear , tear 3 always makes N810 hanging and you can do nothing but waiting
 

The Following User Says Thank You to deter3 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 34 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Mar 2009
#9
midori is better, works for me so far.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to fast1 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 275 | Thanked: 46 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Raleigh, NC
#10
Midori crashed at launch for me. At relaunch a window prompted me to change the preferences. Any suggestions?
__________________
N800 and N810: Diablo MMC2 Boot
 
Reply

Tags
midori, webkit


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:15.