Active Topics

 


Page 10 of 23 « First 89 10 111220 Last »
Reply
Thread Tools
freemangordon is offline freemangordon
2012-01-29 , 17:45
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,960 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#91
Originally Posted by pali View Post
where is log/backtrace?
Burried somewhere in KP thread , will try to find it for you and will post on success.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
freemangordon is offline freemangordon
2012-01-29 , 18:02
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,960 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#92
Pali, look here
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
maacruz is offline maacruz
2012-01-29 , 18:56
Posts: 1,101 | Thanked: 1,184 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Spain
#93
Originally Posted by pali View Post
Yes, Community kernel or kernel in CSSU is really needed for fixed bugs!
.
Yes, but don't lock CSSU on a kernel version or name, that would cause trouble for other kernels. Use a provides tag instead.
 
karam is offline karam
2012-01-29 , 21:29
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#94
Originally Posted by pali View Post
I cannot reproduce wlan issue too.
i cannot too tried everything came on my mind

if it has only been reported by 1 user
that doesn't mean it's a kernel problem in every users' N900 ..
__________________
My Projects:
Speed Patch & Battery patch
Task-Swapper
Wifi-Pwner (MDK3 GUI)
Hacking Tools

Tutorials
How To Increase Camera Image Quality
How To Unblock Repositories In Forbidden Countries [Like Mine]
 
maacruz is offline maacruz
2012-01-30 , 15:47
Posts: 1,101 | Thanked: 1,184 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Spain
#95
Originally Posted by karam View Post
i cannot too tried everything came on my mind

if it has only been reported by 1 user
that doesn't mean it's a kernel problem in every users' N900 ..
On the contrary, if there is a kernel bug, it's a kernel problem for everybody, no matter if observed by 1 user or 1000 users. If it happens to be some kind of race it'll be difficult to observe/reproduce.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to maacruz For This Useful Post:
don_falcone is offline don_falcone
2012-01-30 , 15:52
Posts: 1,523 | Thanked: 1,997 times | Joined on Jul 2011 @ not your mom's FOSS basement
#96
Originally Posted by freemangordon View Post
Is that enabled by default?
That was _my_ question.
 
Estel's Avatar
Estel is offline Estel
2012-01-30 , 16:08
Posts: 5,028 | Thanked: 8,613 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#97
As for high-pass filter:

Originally Posted by pali View Post
Should be activated on startup. Ask more luke-jr for more info.
To be honest, I haven't observed any positive or negative results of enabling this path. Yet, I would li,e to have it configurable, as I was *never* even close to blowing up speakers. Seems like problem for people messing with boosting speakers or whatsnot.

Could anyone (author?) provide at least info, on which frequency limit is set to?

/Estel
__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post:
freemangordon is offline freemangordon
2012-01-30 , 16:19
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,960 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#98
Originally Posted by maacruz View Post
On the contrary, if there is a kernel bug, it's a kernel problem for everybody, no matter if observed by 1 user or 1000 users. If it happens to be some kind of race it'll be difficult to observe/reproduce.
TBH it looks more like buggy AP triggering a bug in the kernel. Not that it matters, an AP shall not be allowed to crash the kernel.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
pali is offline pali
2012-01-30 , 18:49
Posts: 2,153 | Thanked: 8,462 times | Joined on May 2010
#99
Kernel-Power packages are now in Extras-Testing! See first post in http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=71879
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to pali For This Useful Post:
pali is offline pali
2012-01-31 , 12:53
Posts: 2,153 | Thanked: 8,462 times | Joined on May 2010
#100
Now kernel-power has 4 major packages (needed for using):
kernel-power
kernel-power-flasher
kernel-power-modules
kernel-power-bootimg
and some more for development...

I have question: Why two packages are needed for flashing kernel? kernel-power only contains fiasco image (with packaged zImage) and kernel-power-flasher has only postinst script which flash that fiasco image (from package kernel-power) and then REMOVE fiasco image from rootfs. (Note that stock kernel has same process, kernel-power only copied kernel source package)

What do you think about merging kernel-power and kernel-power-flasher to one package kernel-power-flasher? (I will do not delete kernel-power package, I only mark it as dummy/transitional)

Positive on this change:
* you do not need to install kernel-power package
* when you want to reinstall/reflash kernel-power, you need only reinstall package kernel-power-flasher

Negative:
* packages which depends directly on kernel-power will must change dependences to kernel-power-flasher

But I will let kernel-power package in repository, but it will be empty (+ added dependency on kernel-power-flasher) - so this does not break last negative point.

So what do you think?
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to pali For This Useful Post:
Reply
Page 10 of 23 « First 89 10 111220 Last »

Tags
development, kernel-power

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:44.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top