|
2009-10-05
, 22:14
|
Posts: 95 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#22
|
The Following User Says Thank You to peio For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-10-06
, 10:29
|
|
Posts: 2,121 |
Thanked: 1,540 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Oxford, UK
|
#24
|
|
2009-10-06
, 13:29
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#25
|
|
2009-10-06
, 13:41
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#26
|
Doesn't having proximity sensors on all the time add to battery drain? Seems that some hardware keys on the face of the phone would have been a better option. Call, End and Home would have been good. Looks like plenty of room around the bezel.
If the proximity sensors are based on capacitive change, they tend to draw more current than accelerometer sensors that are also on the device.
The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-10-06
, 14:17
|
|
Posts: 42 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#27
|
Video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdTj3d148UI . That looks like it would be useful for N900.
|
2009-10-06
, 14:24
|
|
Posts: 2,121 |
Thanked: 1,540 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Oxford, UK
|
#28
|
|
2009-10-17
, 22:51
|
Posts: 521 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#29
|
|
2009-10-17
, 23:21
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#30
|
Lets hope the N900 doesn't follow the same implementation because the screen is much more sensitive. It guess a swipe to answer would be a better implemention
http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=1576285