|
2013-12-28
, 22:27
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#2
|
|
2013-12-28
, 23:10
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#3
|
|
2013-12-28
, 23:14
|
Posts: 646 |
Thanked: 1,124 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Espoo, Finland
|
#4
|
|
2013-12-28
, 23:30
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#5
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-12-28
, 23:38
|
|
Posts: 513 |
Thanked: 651 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Sweden
|
#6
|
The Following User Says Thank You to xerxes2 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-12-29
, 00:08
|
|
Posts: 513 |
Thanked: 651 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Sweden
|
#7
|
I'd say it is legal in the free world.
BTW, what are you going to use as cryptoengine, and how can users be sure it really does as you advertise?
(not that I'm suspicious or anything, but always when there is a word "crypto" associated with anything, I tend to question motives...)
The Following User Says Thank You to xerxes2 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-12-29
, 00:25
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#8
|
|
2013-12-29
, 00:36
|
Posts: 1,548 |
Thanked: 7,510 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Czech Republic
|
#9
|
|
2013-12-29
, 01:01
|
|
Posts: 513 |
Thanked: 651 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Sweden
|
#10
|
If using a key which is truly random, is at least as long as the encrypted message and is used only once, the Vigenère cipher is theoretically unbreakable.
Edit: I meant decrypt without the key, of course.
But the WM7 "horse" has a blood lineage tracing back to donkeys such as WM6.5, 6.1, 6.0, 5.1 that was fully neglected for too many years and Microsoft did sweet F all to maintain it (still running on Pocket IE4/6!!).
Last edited by xerxes2; 2013-12-29 at 00:14.