|
2010-06-03
, 11:13
|
Posts: 11 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#12
|
|
2010-06-03
, 11:39
|
Posts: 198 |
Thanked: 76 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#13
|
|
2010-06-05
, 04:32
|
Posts: 11 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#14
|
grep -A 13 lock_code /dev/mtd1| tail -4 | head -1 > /home/user/MyDocs/old_lockcode
*
|
2010-06-05
, 04:45
|
|
Posts: 4,365 |
Thanked: 2,467 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Australia Mate
|
#15
|
The Following User Says Thank You to F2thaK For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-06-05
, 05:17
|
Posts: 11 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#16
|
root::
|
2010-06-05
, 14:20
|
Posts: 11 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#17
|
what you posted in #5 looks rather confusing.
afaiu and what i see, there should be only one occurence of lock_code, not two. and if i read that output correctly, there's a new line at the end.
thus, tail -1 would produce an empty string.
i guess, the really interesting part would be those diamonds with ? in them, instead of tail -1 you may try tail -4 | head -1 to get exactly that line.
at least, it looks like flashing the rootfs will reset the code, thus with your issues and that output, i'd guess, something went wrong while flashing.
|
2010-06-05
, 16:52
|
Posts: 198 |
Thanked: 76 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#18
|
I thought that the lock code was one of the very few things to 'survive' a complete reflash?
|
2010-06-05
, 18:11
|
|
Posts: 739 |
Thanked: 242 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Montreal
|
#19
|
i doubt it -- after all, it has to stored somewhere and as far as i understood the flashing and the layout, flashing rootfs and emmc(?) will effectively replace _all_ content with the default data from the images.
|
2010-06-05
, 18:12
|
Posts: 198 |
Thanked: 76 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#20
|
And by 'playing with -A 50 or -B 50', you mean trying the following codes?