Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 602 | Thanked: 735 times | Joined on Mar 2011 @ Nantes, France
#1
Hi,
Just wanted to share because I've the feeling SFOS 1.1.6 drains the battery of the Jolla way more quickly than previous versions.

Of course, I've rebooted the phone.

Anyone else to share his/her feelings about this?
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to romu For This Useful Post:
pichlo's Avatar
Posts: 6,445 | Thanked: 20,981 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ UK
#2
No difference for me.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post:
coderus's Avatar
Posts: 6,436 | Thanked: 12,699 times | Joined on Nov 2011 @ Ängelholm, Sweden
#3
Rebooted phone, killed everything unofficial from autostart, and used only sialfish native official applications?
__________________
Telegram | Openrepos | GitHub | Revolut donations
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to coderus For This Useful Post:
Posts: 602 | Thanked: 735 times | Joined on Mar 2011 @ Nantes, France
#4
Nope, kept iso-functional (same softwares, same settings, same patches). Wouldn't be able to see any difference otherwise.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to romu For This Useful Post:
Community Council | Posts: 4,920 | Thanked: 12,867 times | Joined on May 2012 @ Southerrn Finland
#5
Originally Posted by romu View Post
Hi,
Just wanted to share because I've the feeling SFOS 1.1.6 drains the battery of the Jolla way more quickly than previous versions.
Have you measured the battery depletion with any reliable way?
(logging and graphing battery level against time, for example)
 

The Following User Says Thank You to juiceme For This Useful Post:
Jordi's Avatar
Posts: 400 | Thanked: 708 times | Joined on Jun 2011 @ Geneva - CH
#6
My experience is just the opposite, the idle power consumption is very low, the battery can last 3 to 4 days with a light use.

For me the previous update was such a power hog, and even with a light use the battery was not able to reach 2 days.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jordi For This Useful Post:
Posts: 18 | Thanked: 77 times | Joined on Feb 2015 @ Berlin
#7
Originally Posted by Jordi View Post
My experience is just the opposite, the idle power consumption is very low, the battery can last 3 to 4 days with a light use.

For me the previous update was such a power hog, and even with a light use the battery was not able to reach 2 days.
... same to me
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to peter-berlin For This Useful Post:
Community Council | Posts: 4,920 | Thanked: 12,867 times | Joined on May 2012 @ Southerrn Finland
#8
To get some hard data if power-effiency has changed over latest releases, I decided to re-run my one-week-powergraph experment that I did two months ago.

In a week I'll be able to compare the results
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to juiceme For This Useful Post:
Posts: 602 | Thanked: 735 times | Joined on Mar 2011 @ Nantes, France
#9
Interesting @juiceme, but this raises 2 questions for me:
- as I didn't run any "real" experiment before the update, if I do this now, I don't how I will be able to use this results, any idea?
- could you please describe the process to run such measures?

Thanks.
 
Posts: 301 | Thanked: 531 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ The Netherlands
#10
@romu I installed SysMon / System Monitor, which gives the opportunity to log CPU, battery, etc. for at least a week. After reboot you have to start the engine again, unfortunately.

Just after the update I installed whatsup, so I cannot really compare. CPU seams more jumpy than before. battery usage about the same, a little more consumption.
__________________
Palm Treo -> N900 -> N9 -> Jolla -> SailfishX -> XA2
Developer mode novice, and enjoying it
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rob_kouw For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:46.