|
2007-10-20
, 03:02
|
Posts: 223 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ home
|
#12
|
|
2007-10-20
, 03:46
|
Posts: 751 |
Thanked: 522 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ East Gowanus
|
#13
|
|
2007-10-20
, 04:15
|
Posts: 91 |
Thanked: 45 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
|
#14
|
|
2007-10-20
, 04:28
|
Posts: 223 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ home
|
#15
|
|
2007-10-21
, 12:32
|
Posts: 3,841 |
Thanked: 1,079 times |
Joined on Nov 2006
|
#16
|
|
2007-10-21
, 12:53
|
|
Posts: 481 |
Thanked: 65 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ Westcountry, UK
|
#17
|
|
2007-10-21
, 17:27
|
Posts: 631 |
Thanked: 1,123 times |
Joined on Sep 2005
@ Helsinki
|
#18
|
All that said, ragnar, note how the poll question was worded. A transparency setting could support a gradient of values, from NONE to virtually invisible. The default could, of course, be NONE.
Which really makes the one "O hell no" response a little amusing to me. Don't want an available option? Don't use it.
|
2007-10-21
, 18:01
|
Posts: 90 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on May 2006
|
#19
|
|
2007-10-21
, 18:03
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#20
|
Well, you're not really thinking this issue right now.
You're not asking for a transparency setting to the _current_ finger keyboard. The current finger keyboard duplicates the text field on the top of the view. Editing is done in that text area. Surely you're not asking to keep that feature with a transparent keyboard, right?
You're asking for rather more changes to the interaction logic - I would at least presume...
Besides, as I've said, I'm proposing a setting. You know, one that's optional.
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net