Page 1 of 4 1 23 Last »
Reply
Thread Tools
wongjemi85 is offline wongjemi85
2011-03-16 , 02:05
Posts: 67 | Thanked: 17 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#1
Refer to title
 

The Following User Says Thank You to wongjemi85 For This Useful Post:
lancewex is offline lancewex
2011-03-16 , 02:09
Posts: 661 | Thanked: 690 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#2
No.
Go shopping. They are out there plenty.
For instance:
http://www.frys.com/product/6488512?...H:MAIN_RSLT_PG
 
wongjemi85 is offline wongjemi85
2011-03-16 , 02:11
Posts: 67 | Thanked: 17 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#3
To be specific, i mean phone and tablet, as i don't remember seeing any new resitive touch screen phone or tablet released after the N900
Last edited by wongjemi85; 2011-03-16 at 02:13.
 
lancewex is offline lancewex
2011-03-16 , 02:19
Posts: 661 | Thanked: 690 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#4
What I linked is a tablet. So I guess what you really mean is phone only....?
 
wongjemi85 is offline wongjemi85
2011-03-16 , 02:20
Posts: 67 | Thanked: 17 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#5
Originally Posted by lancewex View Post
What I linked is a tablet. So I guess what you really mean is phone only....?
How about phone?
 
lancewex is offline lancewex
2011-03-16 , 02:25
Posts: 661 | Thanked: 690 times | Joined on Jul 2007
#6
Many I am sure. The Nokia Nuron came out well after the N900. Though not a phone the Archos 32 only recently came out and is resistive.
What's the point of this anyway? Why would you or anyone possibly care?
 
Funklord is offline Funklord
2011-03-16 , 02:45
Posts: 69 | Thanked: 41 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Sweden
#7
Both have advantages and disadvantages, which have been discussed for much longer than a decade.
It's silly when people speak about one being "better" than the other.
Although, I think touch-screens are overkill for most devices, and they promote lazy GUI programming. ie. no button shortcuts for the things you use most often.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Funklord For This Useful Post:
gerbick
2011-03-16 , 02:47
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#8
Most of those sub-$200 Android tablets are resistive screen based.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
danramos's Avatar
danramos is offline danramos
2011-03-16 , 04:41
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#9
Originally Posted by Funklord View Post
Both have advantages and disadvantages, which have been discussed for much longer than a decade.
It's silly when people speak about one being "better" than the other.
Although, I think touch-screens are overkill for most devices, and they promote lazy GUI programming. ie. no button shortcuts for the things you use most often.
THANK YOU! I agree. I regret that devices like the N800 (with a D-pad) weren't improved upon with better D-pads instead of dropping them altogether, as an example. We would have FAR better directional controls in addition to the touchscreen GUI's and MUCH better gaming.
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
monkeyman is offline monkeyman
2011-03-16 , 17:35
Posts: 88 | Thanked: 42 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ USA
#10
I would very much like the claimed N900 (N9.. N950.. whatever it will be... if it will be...) replacement to have a resistive touch screen as I can use it with my motorcycle gloves on and cannot with capacitive screens.
Would be great if the directional keys were in a D-Pad like arrangement. That was one weak spot in the n900 keyboard (the space bar was a little odd also).
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to monkeyman For This Useful Post:
Reply
Page 1 of 4 1 23 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:26.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top