Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Nov 2010
#211
Hi guys,

after some trying, several hours actually, I can't get my head around the following error:

insmod: error inserting '/lib/modules/2.6.28.10maemo-omap1/cifs.ko': -1 Invalid module format

uname -a gives the following output:

Linux Nokia-N900 2.6.28-omap1 #1 PREEMPT Fri Aug 6 11:50:00 EEST 2010 armv7l unknown


I have reflashed my N900 to vanilla -> both mmc + rootfs with the latest available..
Can't get cifs.ko to load.

Someone got a bright idea?
thanks
 
Posts: 4 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Apr 2012
#212
I have an N900 that's just a few days old. I was looking for a way to mount a Windows share on it. I've done this before on a desktop Linux system with a "mount -t cifs ..." type command. When this didn't work on my N900, I realised that the stock device does not have an appropriate kernel module installed for CIFS. I found this thread with the .ko files in the first post and the mention that they're also in extras-testing; so I went to look in the repositories.

I found kernel-module-cifs in extras-testing, which I presume is the one that relates to this thread. However, I also found kernel-modules-maemo in the plain extras repo, a package whose Provides: list has a whole bunch of "kernel-feature-XXXXX" modules one of which is "kernel-feature-cifs", and according to the description "provides kernel modules for the enhanced Maemo 5 kernel 2.6.28.10". So I'm thinking maybe I want this instead, after all it's better to install stable stuff from extras rather than uncleared stuff from -testing or -devel that might "brick my device", right? And looking at the contents of the package, it's a ton of useful-looking .ko's (including cifs.ko and ntfs.ko) being installed to /lib/modules/2.6.28.10maemo-omap1/, loads more in fact than I've already got in the existing /lib/modules/2.6.28-omap1/. Seemingly I would have to install this "enhanced" kernel (2.6.28.10maemo-omap1, right?) to go with it; I had a quick look for that but it wasn't immediately clear where I can get it from and the talk of 'flashing' makes me doubly nervous about a bricking occurring. I don't want to overclock my device (not yet anyway).

Anyone got any comments about the difference between these two CIFS modules, and the reasons for choosing one or the other?
 
Posts: 17 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#213
I would say just install the power kernel as it has a lot of fixes, and look into install CSSU for some other improvements.


http://wiki.maemo.org/Community_SSU
 

The Following User Says Thank You to wickedgtr1 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 20 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Jan 2010 @ The Netherlands
#214
From the moment I got my N900 (over two years now), I used the package "kernel-module-cifs 1.55.0-maemo1". Works without any problems.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to luigi For This Useful Post:
Posts: 4 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Apr 2012
#215
I'm now using kernel-module-cifs successfully. Thanks for the pointer to CSSU too, I'll look into that for later.
 
Reply

Tags
cifs, ntfs, samba, smb, truecrypt


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:14.