Active Topics

 



Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 992 | Thanked: 738 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Low Earth Orbit
#31
Originally Posted by vevgeniev View Post
The official Firefox 17.0 was released on November 20, 2012.
At the beginning of 2011, Firefox was at version 4. Just under 2 years later it's at version 17/18. If they continue at this rate I predict a worldwide shortage of numbers.
 

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to kureyon For This Useful Post:
tanago's Avatar
Posts: 215 | Thanked: 448 times | Joined on Aug 2012 @ Burgas, Bulgaria
#32
Originally Posted by Android_808 View Post
could someone try compiling (preferably thumb) firefox 18 beta. it contains new js engine, ionmonkey, which may help our performance troubles.
I tried a million times but I run into all kind of errors like missing Makefiles.... Just if 'vevgeniev' tells me how he fixed them I will try compiling with every option in the .mozconfig file and then benchmark the builded browser so we can know which compiling options make the browser faster and more stable, able to be used everyday. I have very much free time these weeks.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to tanago For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,808 | Thanked: 4,272 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Germany
#33
Originally Posted by Android_808 View Post
could someone try compiling (preferably thumb) firefox 18 beta. it contains new js engine, ionmonkey, which may help our performance troubles.
+1

I just upgraded my firefox from 17-beta to 18-beta (on Windows XP!) and the speed increase is noticeable!
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to reinob For This Useful Post:
Posts: 19 | Thanked: 149 times | Joined on Aug 2012 @ Pernik, Bulgaria
#34
Originally Posted by tanago View Post
I tried a million times but I run into all kind of errors like missing Makefiles.... Just if 'vevgeniev' tells me how he fixed them I will try compiling with every option in the .mozconfig file and then benchmark the builded browser so we can know which compiling options make the browser faster and more stable, able to be used everyday. I have very much free time these weeks.
I've described everything I did in this article:
http://www.vladislavonline.com/build...-on-maemo-sdk/
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to vevgeniev For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,298 | Thanked: 2,277 times | Joined on May 2011
#35
Note: recent changes fixed the mess created by invalid inclusion of some header files in case of non Maemo builds:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=814979

I.e. any kind of ifdefs shouldn't do this kind of stuff:

Code:
#if !defined(MOZ_PLATFORM_MAEMO)
#include "GLXLibrary.h"
#endif
It's very incorrect, since for example Mer builds don't use GLX, they use EGL.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to shmerl For This Useful Post:
Posts: 204 | Thanked: 423 times | Joined on Jan 2011
#36
I can't download fennec_17.0_armel.deb, I get 404 error.
I also heard that is has problems with post-removal script, at least with purge option, and maybe others too, but I can't confirm that as I can't download it.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to hxka For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,994 | Thanked: 3,342 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ N900: Battery low. N950: torx 4 re-used once and fine; SIM port torn apart
#37
Originally Posted by hxka View Post
I can't download fennec_17.0_armel.deb, I get 404 error.
I also heard that is has problems with post-removal script, at least with purge option, and maybe others too, but I can't confirm that as I can't download it.
I never got to install Fennec 17, with all these script problems, even though I have downloaded it when it was available. I also have Fennec 16 deb saved, and I am currently using Fennec 16.
I cannot guarantee that Fennec 17 deb isn't corrupt, though. It seems to be much smaller in size than Fennec 16 deb.
The debs are too large to attach directly (about 16MB each). Here is the link.
Best wishes.
__________________
Per aspera ad astra...
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wikiwide For This Useful Post:
Posts: 138 | Thanked: 90 times | Joined on Mar 2012
#38
At attempt to remove Fennec 17 I receive:
Code:
Nokia-N900:~# apt-get purge fennec
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  fennec*
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
After this operation, 35,5MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
(Reading database ... 51794 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fennec ...
dpkg: error processing fennec (--purge):
 subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 fennec
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Nokia-N900:~#
Help! All thanks for any help!
 
Posts: 1,994 | Thanked: 3,342 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ N900: Battery low. N950: torx 4 re-used once and fine; SIM port torn apart
#39
Originally Posted by Tiran View Post
At attempt to remove Fennec 17 I receive:
Code:
Nokia-N900:~# apt-get purge fennec
Removing fennec ...
dpkg: error processing fennec (--purge):
 subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 fennec
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Nokia-N900:~#
Help! All thanks for any help!
Try having a window of fennec open while purging it.
Best wishes.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Wikiwide For This Useful Post:
Posts: 20 | Thanked: 56 times | Joined on Sep 2011 @ Leuven/Belgium
#40
Originally Posted by vevgeniev View Post
I've described everything I did in this article:
http://www.vladislavonline.com/build...-on-maemo-sdk/
your site is down the repository as well, at least I cannot connect

props for the work though! I'll give it a go once I get the fennec_17
 

The Following User Says Thank You to napaDokc For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
fennec, firefox mobile


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:04.