Active Topics
-
Extra softwares in Sailfish using CLI, repositories, etc (117)
to SailfishOS by nieldk - 10 hrs, 53 mins ago -
Firefox with Leste (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 1 day, 7 hrs ago - more...
|
2014-06-21
, 21:03
|
|
Posts: 3,074 |
Thanked: 12,960 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Sofia,Bulgaria
|
#22
|
Originally Posted by shawnjefferson
It should enter cssu-devel first, please either send(somehow) a patch series against https://gitorious.org/community-ssu/...13c16d60245c8: or clone that repo, merge (keeping the commits) and do a merge request, so 1. it could be reviewed (if possible) 2. someone with access to upload it in cssu-devel
Completely stable on my device, no issues.
It would be nice to get it into CSSU-T for larger group testing... ?
__________________
Never fear. I is here.
720p video support on N900,SmartReflex on N900,Keyboard and mouse support on N900
Nothing is impossible - Stable thumb2 on n900
Community SSU developer
kernel-power developer and maintainer
Never fear. I is here.
720p video support on N900,SmartReflex on N900,Keyboard and mouse support on N900
Nothing is impossible - Stable thumb2 on n900
Community SSU developer
kernel-power developer and maintainer
Last edited by freemangordon; 2014-06-21 at 21:07.
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2014-06-22
, 03:45
|
|
Posts: 254 |
Thanked: 509 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Canada
|
#23
|
I think someone with more package-fu will have to get this into cssu-devel. All I did was download the openssl 0.9.8za source and compile it, no patching of existing versions or anything exotic. Is there more involved than a cssu-devel maintainer doing the same thing? (I guess what I'm asking is, is there any reason to not just go with the upstream 0.9.8za version?)
Packaging up a system package like this for cssu is a bit beyond my knowledge at the moment.
Last edited by shawnjefferson; 2014-06-22 at 03:48.
Packaging up a system package like this for cssu is a bit beyond my knowledge at the moment.
Last edited by shawnjefferson; 2014-06-22 at 03:48.
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to shawnjefferson For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2014-06-22
, 07:55
|
|
Posts: 2,290 |
Thanked: 4,133 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ UK
|
#24
|
Originally Posted by freemangordon
This is why. If there are bugs (which is possible looking at the ABI compatibility) it would be nice to be able to have the code in git to fix.
so it could be reviewed (if possible)
I have never used git but is it possible to merge this into a new branch on cssu openssl git?
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/t...L_0_9_8-stable
Looks like they are preparing for 0.9.8zb from some of the notes there.
__________________
Wiki Admin
sixwheeledbeast's wiki
Testing Squad Subscriber
- mcallerx - tenminutecore - FlopSwap - Qnotted - zzztop - Bander - Fight2048 -
Before posting or starting a thread please try this.
Wiki Admin
sixwheeledbeast's wiki
Testing Squad Subscriber
- mcallerx - tenminutecore - FlopSwap - Qnotted - zzztop - Bander - Fight2048 -
Before posting or starting a thread please try this.
|
|
2014-06-22
, 19:53
|
|
Posts: 2,153 |
Thanked: 8,462 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#25
|
this page can be usefull: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/openssl.html
|
|
2014-10-19
, 23:12
|
|
Posts: 567 |
Thanked: 2,965 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#27
|
ok, so http://www.cncmods.net/files/openssl.diff is a diff between the 0.9.8n stock tarball from openssl and the 0.9.8n-1+maemo4+0m5 version Fremantle is currently using. What is needed is for someone to take 0.9.8zc (current 0.9.8 version) and figure out which, if any, of the changes in that diff file need to be made to it. I dont know enough about openssl (or perl for that matter, referencing all those .pl files in the diff) do that.
Once that's been done, someone can put the results in https://gitorious.org/community-ssu/openssl and from there into CSSU.
Once that's been done, someone can put the results in https://gitorious.org/community-ssu/openssl and from there into CSSU.
 |
|
2014-10-20
, 07:04
|
|
Posts: 2,222 |
Thanked: 12,651 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ SOL 3
|
#28
|
seems the whole patch is just about J-PAKE in a test frame, and a zillion of shebang lines changed from
#!/usr/local/perl
to
#!perl
or similar.
wasn't able to spot any relevant difference, maybe due to the lots of noise in the diff. Also it's inverted (+++ vs ---) which doesn't help reading it.
#!/usr/local/perl
to
#!perl
or similar.
wasn't able to spot any relevant difference, maybe due to the lots of noise in the diff. Also it's inverted (+++ vs ---) which doesn't help reading it.
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to joerg_rw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2014-10-22
, 02:37
|
|
Posts: 254 |
Thanked: 509 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Canada
|
#29
|
Originally Posted by jonwil
Is there really any reason not to just run the current version? I've been running 0.9.8za on my device for months with no ill effects. Are there "special patches" that were created just for the n900?
ok, so http://www.cncmods.net/files/openssl.diff is a diff between the 0.9.8n stock tarball from openssl and the 0.9.8n-1+maemo4+0m5 version Fremantle is currently using. What is needed is for someone to take 0.9.8zc (current 0.9.8 version) and figure out which, if any, of the changes in that diff file need to be made to it. I dont know enough about openssl (or perl for that matter, referencing all those .pl files in the diff) do that.
Once that's been done, someone can put the results in https://gitorious.org/community-ssu/openssl and from there into CSSU.
| The Following User Says Thank You to shawnjefferson For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2014-10-22
, 08:54
|
|
Posts: 567 |
Thanked: 2,965 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#30
|
I have no idea if the (Nokia-specific) changes in that .diff file matter or not, hence why I posted it here so someone who knows more than I do can figure that out.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jonwil For This Useful Post: | ||
It would be nice to get it into CSSU-T for larger group testing... ?