Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#11
Originally Posted by smoku View Post
I love the current Hildon/GTK+/GNOME/Freedesktop/etc. state of affairs and mourn on Qt killing this great platform.
I don't disagree, but this is really old news and done to death in another thread. At least MeeGo will officially support both Qt and GTK+/Clutter.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post:
HtheB's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 3,715 | Thanked: 7,419 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Bize Her Yer Trabzon
#12
I don't get this thread at all...

Whats the problem?
__________________
www.HtheB.com
Please donate if you think I'm doing a good job.
 
Posts: 24 | Thanked: 38 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Denmark
#13
I don't know whether to laugh or cry...
 
Posts: 49 | Thanked: 41 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#14
Originally Posted by admiral0 View Post
Welcome to 1995 boys and girls, when nobody doesn't know what oop means.
GObject introduces oop. Please use facts
 
Posts: 279 | Thanked: 293 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Italy
#15
Originally Posted by viraptor View Post
GObject introduces oop. Please use facts
Please don't make me laugh. GObject is like a punch in the eye. It forces oop into C where it does not belong.

P.S. I wait for this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x
 
Posts: 49 | Thanked: 41 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#16
Originally Posted by admiral0 View Post
Please don't make me laugh. GObject is like a punch in the eye. It forces oop into C where it does not belong.
Syntax does not OOP make You can always use Vala instead and get (mostly) the same effect.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to viraptor For This Useful Post:
Posts: 61 | Thanked: 21 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#17
C++0x == "The end of us all".

Lot of "modern" coders should attend classes of "old school" programming before learning oop anyway.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BlackDiamond For This Useful Post:
qwerty12's Avatar
Posts: 4,274 | Thanked: 5,358 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Looking at y'all and sighing
#18
Originally Posted by lma View Post
At least MeeGo will officially support both Qt and GTK+/Clutter.
How well supported will it be, however? "[...]Included for application compatibility" doesn't really sound "supported".

I don't dislike Qt itself nor the applications written utilizing it, but I fail to see how it's "easier" (except for, what I can tell from my limited knowledge, making custom GUIs).

Last edited by qwerty12; 2010-04-20 at 11:54.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to qwerty12 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 279 | Thanked: 293 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Italy
#19
Originally Posted by viraptor View Post
Syntax does not OOP make You can always use Vala instead and get (mostly) the same effect.
Vala introduces yet another layer (valac) and needs bindings in a special format (vapi). Why should i shoot myself in the foot?
 
Posts: 279 | Thanked: 293 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Italy
#20
Originally Posted by qwerty12 View Post
How well supported will it be, however? "[...]Included for application compatibility" doesn't really sound "supported".

I don't dislike Qt itself nor the applications written in it, but I fail to see how it's "easier" (except for, what I can tell from my limited knowledge, making custom GUIs).
Try QT creator or Kdevelop and you'll see
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to admiral0 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
flamewar ftw, gtk ftw, gtk is simpler, gtk+, ide religion, maemo5, misguided rant, n gtk support, no qt, pointless, qt ftw, qt is simple, qt=not cute, stupid fud, trollparty


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:21.