Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 341 | Thanked: 607 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#201
Originally Posted by arsinmsn View Post
So the question with the lack of a cancel button is: how do you teach (or remind) the user that the dialog box is closed. I think the answer is to standardize the ways boxes and windows can disappear. So a box being hidden by a window (the other likely possibility when clicking outside the dialog) should disappear differently from a box being dismissed. Presumably the style of dismissal disappearance would be similar in style to what happens to a window when its application has closed. Some small animation might be appropriate.
Clicking outside a window will always close it, it won't get hidden by selecting something behind it. It's a common mechanic all over the UI, so it becomes perfectly natural after five seconds of "training".

And it's really not any different than what is already very common on our desktops (menu popups are closed by clicking outside) and all over the web (navigation popups are regularly closed the same way). It's just made even more discoverable by the blurring of the background.

In this case difference does indeed equal advantage, because it's plain more effective to use the large unused space for closing instead of a small button.
 
Posts: 341 | Thanked: 607 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#202
Originally Posted by Master of Gizmo View Post
Single major problem with this: He thinks clicking the X is the supposed way to close the dialog which it in fact isn't. But i can live with that ...
This won't be an issue if the blurring is strong enough to make the X practically disappear.

It might be an issue with Mer, if the blurring cannot be implemented this way. Then again, Mer is probably mainly going to be used by people familiar with the matter.
 
Reply

Tags
fremantle


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:56.