SD69
|
2009-04-01
, 00:01
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#21
|
|
2009-04-01
, 00:07
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#22
|
|
2009-04-01
, 00:51
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#23
|
|
2009-04-01
, 02:57
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#24
|
|
2009-04-01
, 03:09
|
|
Posts: 1,562 |
Thanked: 349 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
|
#25
|
|
2009-04-01
, 03:11
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#26
|
No. What I don't like is that, in addition to other anti-competitive policies designed to foster a closed network, they take various action to discourage or outright limit tethering to devices that they haven't approved for use on their network.
|
2009-04-01
, 03:19
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#27
|
|
2009-04-01
, 03:33
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#28
|
|
2009-04-01
, 05:49
|
|
Posts: 1,562 |
Thanked: 349 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
|
#29
|
|
2009-07-28
, 14:39
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#30
|