Reply
Thread Tools
ericsson is offline ericsson
2011-07-04 , 19:45
Banned | Posts: 974 | Thanked: 622 times | Joined on Oct 2010
#1
WP is steaming forward, and the epic and ever lasting battle for the best WP device is starting, leaving everyone else in the dust. Here is Samsungs version:

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_work...-news-2850.php
 
marxian's Avatar
marxian is offline marxian
2011-07-04 , 20:01
Posts: 2,448 | Thanked: 9,523 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Wigan, UK
#2
It's like putting a Ford Fiesta engine in a Ferrari. :/
__________________
'Men of high position are allowed, by a special act of grace, to accomodate their reasoning to the answer they need. Logic is only required in those of lesser rank.' - J K Galbraith

My website

GitHub
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to marxian For This Useful Post:
Wreck's Avatar
Wreck is offline Wreck
2011-07-04 , 21:11
Posts: 304 | Thanked: 266 times | Joined on Apr 2011 @ Apeldoorn area, Netherlands
#3
Originally Posted by marxian View Post
It's like putting a Ford Fiesta engine in a Ferrari. :/
And the engine would require 1 billion update before it would even start-up Not a huge fan of a WP.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Wreck For This Useful Post:
Kangal's Avatar
Kangal is offline Kangal
2011-07-05 , 08:27
Posts: 1,789 | Thanked: 1,699 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#4
This is so true. At least the Android engine isn't half bad, I much rather prefer hybrids though:
You know a Mexican (MeeGo) engine with Dalvik
or the opposite an Android engine with fully implemented Twin-Turbo system, I mean C++/Qt.
I could see myself settling for a HP engine with Dalvik, if the price is right!
 
ericsson is offline ericsson
2011-07-05 , 10:58
Banned | Posts: 974 | Thanked: 622 times | Joined on Oct 2010
#5
Originally Posted by Wreck View Post
And the engine would require 1 billion update before it would even start-up Not a huge fan of a WP.
Given the choice if WP and Android when all else is equal, I would chose WP every time.
 
Reffyyyy is offline Reffyyyy
2011-07-05 , 11:25
Posts: 662 | Thanked: 653 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#6
It won't really be a Galaxy S 2 without the exynos chipset.

I think I'd let Windows Phone 7 mature before I purchased a device. It definitely has potential, but it's not quite there yet.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Reffyyyy For This Useful Post:
Verythrax's Avatar
Verythrax is offline Verythrax
2011-07-05 , 11:57
Posts: 190 | Thanked: 167 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Brazil
#7
Originally Posted by Reffyyyy View Post
It won't really be a Galaxy S 2 without the exynos chipset.

I think I'd let Windows Phone 7 mature before I purchased a device. It definitely has potential, but it's not quite there yet.
Exactly. People forget that WP7 isn't designed like Android, to run on any chipset. Or do you put it in the suggested hardware, or Microsoft won't license it.
 
afaq's Avatar
afaq is offline afaq
2011-07-05 , 12:36
Posts: 1,038 | Thanked: 1,408 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ London
#8
I fail to see a good reason why WP7 would be the OS of choice (in comparison to any OS). Id much rather go for symbia even (better browser though).

large tiles and screens that dont fit on one screen...preference i suppose.
__________________
Graphic and Calligraphy Designer
check out my site www.afaqali.com
 
Frappacino is offline Frappacino
2011-07-05 , 12:56
Posts: 619 | Thanked: 691 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#9
>> I think I'd let Windows Phone 7 mature before I purchased a device. It definitely has potential, but it's not quite there yet.

Hehe reminds me of the old rule of thumb on MS products.

Only get it after its been in the market for 6 months +, so you can then get the fully patched version
 
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:58.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top