pelago
|
2009-09-06
, 11:43
|
|
Posts: 2,121 |
Thanked: 1,540 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Oxford, UK
|
#91
|
|
2009-09-06
, 21:38
|
Posts: 36 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
|
#92
|
|
2009-09-06
, 22:12
|
|
Posts: 2,121 |
Thanked: 1,540 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Oxford, UK
|
#93
|
|
2009-09-17
, 01:55
|
|
Posts: 122 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Paris, France
|
#94
|
The Following User Says Thank You to noventa98 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-09-19
, 10:02
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 19 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Australia
|
#95
|
Obviously Nokia considered that option and decided the time investment would cost more than the feature was worth.
|
2009-09-19
, 10:07
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#96
|
This is a great feature well worthwhile when it works and for us sight-challenged users will be even more important on smaller screens (read N900).
Isn't this something that the community could fix? Like many here I use FWTV a lot but would like to see it improved.
|
2009-09-19
, 11:42
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 19 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Australia
|
#97
|
There isn't an explanation that isn't covered by my statement. You're free to disagree with Nokia, but that doesn't change the validity of my point.
Why not reserve judgement until you try the device? FWTV isn't the only solution to the problem, and maybe you'll find you like the solutions Nokia decided were workable more.
Then scratch your own itch! That's what open source is all about. MicroB is open source, if you want FWTV then make it happen.
Again, this seems like a strange summary judgement to make without having used the device.
|
2009-09-19
, 17:33
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#98
|
You seem to know that Nokia 'obviously' decided not to fix FWTV...I'm not so well connected! But there would be no cost in leaving the feature intact and as-is. To me it is important!
What? Swirly and tap&tap. Is there something else? Both of these features are worthy but neither deal with my need to zoom and squeeze.
Yes General I'm itchy, thats why I'm here! Being a part of the solution....
Have I missed something? I can't read it without zoom and if I zoom I must scroll...! Its the scrolling that's a pain, no?
What is obvious is that others here feel similarly and together we are looking for solutions.
|
2009-09-21
, 09:30
|
|
Posts: 122 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Paris, France
|
#99
|
|
2009-09-21
, 09:46
|
|
Posts: 1,665 |
Thanked: 1,649 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Praha, Czech Republic
|
#100
|
But there would be no cost in leaving the feature intact and as-is. To me it is important!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Andre Klapper For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
fixed in harmattan, what is microb? |
|