Page 5 of 6 « First 34 5 6
Reply
Thread Tools
ARJWright's Avatar
ARJWright is offline ARJWright
2009-12-14 , 00:00
Posts: 861 | Thanked: 734 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Nomadic
#41
Comparing the 3+years of development that went into the N95 to the just implemented feature of the N900 seems at one instance unfair and another speaks to the teams at Nokia that might not have talked enough or shared enough lessons learned to make such compairsons moot.

Anyone want to get a N95 Carl Zeiss programmer in here so that an attemppt to fix things follows those lessons learned?
__________________

antoinerjwright.com | Mobile Ministry Magazine
 
lma is offline lma
2009-12-14 , 01:12
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#42
Originally Posted by jessi3k3 View Post
In that case, I wouldn't mind a command line only camera application
Well, it's all v4l2 and gstreamer under the hood. You can use something like "gst-launch v4l2src device=/dev/video0 ! ffmpegcolorspace ! pngenc snapshot=1 ! filesink location=photo.png" for starters...
 

The Following User Says Thank You to lma For This Useful Post:
attila77 is offline attila77
2009-12-14 , 02:53
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#43
I was kind of contemplating to write a small front-end to tweak the things available through the config file, that, at least, should be fairly non-destructive (and safer than having people editing config files and restarting daemons). Kind of worried to release it to Extras though, people might think it will turn their N900 into a DSLR, which it most certainly won't.
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 

The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
RevdKathy's Avatar
RevdKathy is offline RevdKathy
2009-12-14 , 08:11
Posts: 2,173 | Thanked: 2,678 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Cornwall, UK
#44
Two things: first, did anyone have the n95 at first release? I did (first day) and the camera sucked. The colour balance was waay off. It was dreadful. Took a couple of firmware updates before they really improved it.

Secondly, I have seen at least one person getting amazing photos from an n900, so a lot of it is down to usage. If someone who was in Barcelona can identify Thomas (sp?) who was taking a lot of pics, for me and point me to his board username, I'd like to ask him to write us a wiki page on how to get the best out of the camera.
__________________
Hi! I'm Kathy and I'm a Maemo Greeter! Welcome.
Useful links for newcomers: New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Did you know Meego.com has forums too?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to RevdKathy For This Useful Post:
kryptoniankid17's Avatar
kryptoniankid17 is offline kryptoniankid17
2009-12-14 , 08:49
Posts: 297 | Thanked: 54 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ new jersey, usa
#45
Originally Posted by Bratag View Post
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=33420

Read that thread.

And as I said this is most likely NOT a software related issue, there is only so much that can be done in software (if I get another idiot emailing me about my camera app in Android not having a flash - Like I can code a goddamn flash into your phone when it doesnt have one - I may lose my mind). There may be tweaks that can be applied via software, image format and compression etc. But ultimately we are talking about a small aperture and most likely a small sensor as well. Remember this is a PHONE - the camera part is a small component in an otherwise large set of them. Comparing it to a dedicated camera etc is pointless.
nokia has plenty of phones with cameras with amazing quality. so i should except a step backwards? have you ever owned a nokia?
 
HugoSon is offline HugoSon
2009-12-14 , 10:37
Posts: 221 | Thanked: 51 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Germany
#46
It takes good pictures; but of course you cannot compare it to a digital camera – even having fewer pixels. I.e. the distance between the (very, very small) sensor and the (plastic! a mobile phone is supposed to be light; so nobody would accept glass lenses) lens is just too small to get a good parallel light signal on the sensor. You can do quite a bunch with software – but there are limits.
 
DaSilva is offline DaSilva
2009-12-14 , 10:45
Posts: 729 | Thanked: 155 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#47
Originally Posted by RevdKathy View Post
Two things: first, did anyone have the n95 at first release? I did (first day) and the camera sucked. The colour balance was waay off. It was dreadful. Took a couple of firmware updates before they really improved it.

Secondly, I have seen at least one person getting amazing photos from an n900, so a lot of it is down to usage. If someone who was in Barcelona can identify Thomas (sp?) who was taking a lot of pics, for me and point me to his board username, I'd like to ask him to write us a wiki page on how to get the best out of the camera.
Do you mean Tomaszd?
 
sennyk is offline sennyk
2009-12-14 , 12:37
Posts: 10 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#48
Originally Posted by CharlieCharlie View Post
While we're talking about images, is there a way to timestamp images as I need a time and date on photos for work purposes??
The images are stored in the EXIF file format. There is a tag in the EXIF header that can be used to fill in the time and date. My N900 fills this in properly. If you have a debian based system, you can install an app that will spit out the EXIF tags. The command line app is called exif. Type "sudo apt-get install exif" to install it.

Before this app came out, I wrote an app to change the name of all of my jpegs to the date and time the picture was taken. Attached to this is the source for this.
Attached Files
File Type: gz rename_pics.tar.gz (1.1 KB, 58 views)
 
deakhead is offline deakhead
2009-12-14 , 12:52
Posts: 11 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#49
Originally Posted by Kieron View Post
Just looks a little grainy(er) or something - i dont know, hard to explain. Thought it might be related. Looks pretty good though, for a phone:



taken on my desk a few minutes ago of a buzz i have lying around!
The grainy are digital noise of camera sensor due to insufficient lighting. I say this because JPEG compression artifacts appear differently. Cellphones generally have small aperture (the hole where light goes in) so it is difficult to take good pictures in dim light -- this includes N900. I was kinda disappointed but well this is not a professional DSLR, so I guess I had too high of expectation from N900. You can get a pretty good quality image in day light though.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to deakhead For This Useful Post:
Bratag is offline Bratag
2009-12-14 , 14:08
Posts: 2,014 | Thanked: 1,581 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#50
Originally Posted by kryptoniankid17 View Post
nokia has plenty of phones with cameras with amazing quality. so i should except a step backwards? have you ever owned a nokia?
Um yes I have actually - and I didn't mention anything about you having to take a step backwards - I was simply pointing out in the post you quoted that there are a limited number of things that can be fixed in software.

That being said - comparing one Nokia to another without knowing the exact hardware in each is as stupid as comparing the N900 to a dedicated camera. Just because one Nokia had a certain set of HW doesn't automatically mean the next one will have the same or better.
__________________
Class .. : Power Poster, Potential Coder
Humor .. : [*********] Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Patience : [***-------] Weapon(s): +2 Logic Mace
Agro ... : |*****-----] Relic(s) : G1, N900
 
Reply
Page 5 of 6 « First 34 5 6

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:57.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top