Poll: What do you think should be the user-visible friendly name for the terminal app?
Poll Options
What do you think should be the user-visible friendly name for the terminal app?

Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 3,401 | Thanked: 1,255 times | Joined on Nov 2005 @ London, UK
#31
As has been said already, removing the icon makes shell access feel more like a cheat code rather than a fully supported feature of the platform, and might even become the thin end of the wedge with shell access dropped completely from Maemo 7 (or whatever).

Power user access is perhaps the greatest thing Maemo has in it's favour in comparison to the other platforms, so dumbing it down doesn't seem like the best move.

I vote to keep the xterm icon as it is now (although it could do with a better icon, see bug #7315), and add a one-time warning (sort of like "Here be dragons!" in the Firefox about:config) if there are concerns that end users may stuff up their devices because they don't know what they're doing.

As for a name... Terminal works for me (as it is in Ubuntu).
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Milhouse For This Useful Post:
mullf's Avatar
Posts: 610 | Thanked: 391 times | Joined on Feb 2006 @ DC, USA
#32
I just call it xterm.
__________________
Nokia 770 Internet Tablet = best device ever made

Deuteronomy 13:6-10; 2 Kings 2:23-24; Judges 19:22-29
 
ArnimS's Avatar
Posts: 1,107 | Thanked: 720 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Germany
#33
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
Just curious: how would you feel about Maemo 6 not having a terminal app in the application grid out of the box but having a Ctlr-Shift-X shortcut to boot the terminal?

The purpose of the change being that pure end user don't have to wonder what to do with this, while power users and developers would have it just as handy.
Makes a lot of sense to not confuse users with that.

The shortcut would be ok, or:

- no shortcut, xterm installable like any other package.
- shortcut+bundled_hidden_xterm -- but becoming visible with a .desktop icon after installing the xterm (icon) package.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ArnimS For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#34
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
Just curious: how would you feel about Maemo 6 not having a terminal app in the application grid out of the box but having a Ctlr-Shift-X shortcut to boot the terminal?
On a personal level it doesn't make much difference (I know how to roll my own and I'm sure that if Nokia takes the launcher away there'll be a community package in extras restoring it the following day).

On the other hand, taking it away is going to make asking users for debugging data that much more difficult. It's already bad enough when we have to explain how to become root or (heaven forbid) enable the tools repository and install sysklogd but also having to explain how to start the terminal is a step too far IMHO. So I'm against it, please don't make the terminal an easter egg.

The purpose of the change being that pure end user don't have to wonder what to do with this
It's just a command line terminal, not alien technology. Every desktop OS has one so users generally know what it is even if they don't know (or care) how to use it. For users who have never used a personal computer before a) everything is going to seem strange and b) a "mobile computer" is probably not what they want in the first place.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post:
Posts: 65 | Thanked: 43 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#35
Started thinking about removing the xterm icon and for me it would be acceptable to not have it out of the box. I definitely understand the reasoning of extra icon that most users will have no use.

On the other hand I think most smartphone users know that there is a mysterious command line in their Win/Linux/Mac. This could very well be one of the things that will give them the impression that they are holding a small computer instead of a phone.

It is also a symbol of openness that can score major points with the hardcore crowd and maybe some points even with people who will not actually end up using it, but understand what it is.

I would consider myself too biased to make a rational choice though
 

The Following User Says Thank You to reviver For This Useful Post:
Helmuth's Avatar
Posts: 1,259 | Thanked: 1,341 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Germany
#36
Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
If you are going to do that please choose a better shortcut. Also what if the next maemo device does not have a hard keyboard? (unless your indirectly giving up info lol).
The next maemo device will have a multitouch Display, so STRG+SHIFT+X on the Screen is also possible. (or impossible because of the lack of skill)

But I will also prefer a option to add a X-Terminal Icon manually!
 
Posts: 474 | Thanked: 283 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Oxford, UK
#37
Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
add a one-time warning (sort of like "Here be dragons!" in the Firefox about:config) if there are concerns that end users may stuff up their devices because they don't know what they're doing.
I think the one-time warning is a great idea.

After all, it already warns about every single app that you install...

Rather than being a single line, it could explain what the terminal is in newbie terms (Linux, command line...), and provide Ok / No Thanks buttons. There should be a way to reinstate the warning, for after you did something with the terminal on someone else's Maemo device
 
Posts: 329 | Thanked: 142 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#38
I think a repeat warning is better. If a visiting geek 'deflowers' the terminal and removes that warning, the regular user might well be lost afterwards
I vote for a line going something like "Here you can type commands to be executed" printed in the terminal itself (like the output of a 'cat') before it starts accepting commands. Informative, reliable, unobtrusive (regular users will just ignore it) and easy to implement
As for the icon: make it stylish and leave it there. Show that there's more to the beast than beats the eye
__________________
I don't mean to crush your hopes, I just can't help it
 

The Following User Says Thank You to MrGrim For This Useful Post:
Posts: 286 | Thanked: 259 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ Cambridge, England
#39
Originally Posted by MrGrim View Post
I think a repeat warning is better. If a visiting geek 'deflowers' the terminal and removes that warning, the regular user might well be lost afterwards
I vote for a line going something like "Here you can type commands to be executed" printed in the terminal itself (like the output of a 'cat') before it starts accepting commands. Informative, reliable, unobtrusive (regular users will just ignore it) and easy to implement
As for the icon: make it stylish and leave it there. Show that there's more to the beast than beats the eye
Great minds think alike, I had the same idea and did this screenshot,



I don't really like the idea of a shortcut to start the Terminal, for similiar reasons that others have posted here. I think shortcuts work for things like cut and paste, but not the Terminal. It should remain as an icon, but perhaps with a friendly message that tells the curious where to get more info, or those not interested to close it.

Rich
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to richie For This Useful Post:
pelago's Avatar
Posts: 2,121 | Thanked: 1,540 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Oxford, UK
#40
Thanks for all the votes. So at the time of writing there is roughly a 2:1 majority prefer Terminal (49 votes) over X Terminal (25 votes). Is Nokia likely to see this, or should I link to it via Brainstorm or bugs.maemo.org?

Last edited by pelago; 2010-02-03 at 14:05.
 
Reply

Tags
get a life, who cares :p, xterm, xterm you fools!


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:34.