Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 359 | Thanked: 162 times | Joined on Jan 2011 @ Budapest
#1
How come the bloggers, the expert sites etc, all say the N9 is the first 'all screen, button free' phone?

Wasn't the N900 that?
 
Posts: 258 | Thanked: 76 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Lima-Peru
#2
The n900 was never meant to be a mass production device....

So, many people don't even know it.

Its a shame that this was all because of nokia not giving it a real chance
__________________
I Luvvvv My N900!!

Have my N900 since 2010 and still is my main phone!

I'm Making money viewing Ads Here Now making money to donate to the forum
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Shinigamijim For This Useful Post:
5spdvl's Avatar
Posts: 220 | Thanked: 66 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Melbourne, Australia
#3
How is the N900 (or the N9) a buttonless phone? It has a whole keyboard.
 
maluka's Avatar
Posts: 741 | Thanked: 900 times | Joined on Nov 2007 @ Auckland NZ
#4
Originally Posted by 5spdvl View Post
How is the N900 (or the N9) a buttonless phone? It has a whole keyboard.
You can use the phone without touching the keyboard
 

The Following User Says Thank You to maluka For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#5
Originally Posted by noetus View Post
How come the bloggers, the expert sites etc, all say the N9 is the first 'all screen, button free' phone?

Wasn't the N900 that?
Never mind that, why are they saying it as if it was a good thing or that it mattered at all? The N9 still has huge non-screen areas on the front anyway, so what does "button free" buy for the customer?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to lma For This Useful Post:
Posts: 10 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Oct 2011 @ Alabama
#6
I like the fact that since it's not a mass produced phone, no one knows how to use it but myself. Not many fights over who uses my phone.
 
Posts: 359 | Thanked: 162 times | Joined on Jan 2011 @ Budapest
#7
Originally Posted by lma View Post
Never mind that, why are they saying it as if it was a good thing or that it mattered at all? The N9 still has huge non-screen areas on the front anyway, so what does "button free" buy for the customer?
I suppose it's supposed to be "easier to use" or more fluid because all your interaction is "on screen". This is , anyways. You're right that there is still room for buttons, so removing them hasn't all by itself freed up space for the screen, though comparing the front of the N9 with the front of the iPhone 4, the iPhone does look a bit dated in terms of the amount of real-estate not being used for its screen.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to noetus For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#8
Originally Posted by noetus View Post
I suppose it's supposed to be "easier to use" or more fluid because all your interaction is "on screen". This is , anyways.
Cop out/marketing spin. If that's the case, he shouldn't have put buttons on the sides either. Could it be that (gosh!) buttons actually make interaction easier?
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:00.