Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 5 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ china
#1
Homepage:http://moblin.org/

Is that possible port to N8X0?
 
Bundyo's Avatar
Posts: 4,708 | Thanked: 4,649 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Bulgaria
#2
Yes. Anyone does know.

No.

P.S. Welcome to zombo.com. You can do anything at zombo.com. Anything at all...
__________________
Technically, there are three determinate states the cat could be in: Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.

Last edited by Bundyo; 2009-03-26 at 09:58.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Bundyo For This Useful Post:
Posts: 161 | Thanked: 99 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#3
Originally Posted by zyufo View Post
Is that possible port to N8X0?
Moblin is optimized specifically for Intel Atom CPUs. So by porting Moblin to ARM/N8x0 you would loose most speed advantages which differentiate Moblin from all the other mobile Linux distros out there.
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#4
As the question "Can distro x work on the tablets?" seems to frequently come up, I've decided to devise a simple code system which can be used to quickly explain the usefulness and feasibility of any given operating system being considered for tablet usage.

I call it Tablet Usefulness and Feasibility System or TUFS.

TUFS works like this: there are two primary fields, Usefulness and Feasibility, and one optional secondary field, Difficulty. Usefulness can be Pointless, Mostly pointless, Interesting, or Useful. Feasibility can be Impossible, Possible, or Already working. Difficulty is on a scale of 1-4 (1 being "easy to port", 4 being "damn near impossible"), and only applies of porting is possible.

So, for Moblin, the TUFS would look something like: MP2. It's mostly pointless (since Moblin's major advantage is targeting Atom for improved power saving), but possible, if somewhat difficult.
__________________
Ryan Abel
 
fpp's Avatar
Posts: 2,853 | Thanked: 968 times | Joined on Nov 2005
#5
So the scale goes from UA0 to PI4 ? I hope you're not mulling a similar scheme for the next "member level" system :-)
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#6
Originally Posted by fpp View Post
So the scale goes from UA0 to PI4 ?
The difficulty level applies only when something is actually impossible. So that'd be PI not PI4.

If you'd like, I could translate the scale into smilies:
  • Usefulness
    • Pointless -
    • Mostly Pointless -
    • Interesting -
    • Useful -
  • Feasibility
    • Impossible -
    • Possible -
    • Already working -
Originally Posted by fpp View Post
I hope you're not mulling a similar scheme for the next "member level" system :-)
Thus making Moblin: 2

No, the scale for the member level system I'm mulling is the release codenames.
__________________
Ryan Abel

Last edited by GeneralAntilles; 2009-03-26 at 11:34.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post:
Bundyo's Avatar
Posts: 4,708 | Thanked: 4,649 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Bulgaria
#7
Umm, Moblin relies on 3D layer and Clutter... so that's 4 for you
__________________
Technically, there are three determinate states the cat could be in: Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#8
Originally Posted by Bundyo View Post
Umm, Moblin relies on 3D layer and Clutter... so that's 4 for you
Hardly. More like a 3 for current tablets (depending on how you rate the likelihood of Nokia's success with ImagTech) since a software rending solution isn't that far-fetched, but I'm speaking more of any tablet (including the OMAP3 ones).
__________________
Ryan Abel
 
Reply

Tags
moblin, ubuntu


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:24.