Active Topics
-
Firefox with Leste (5)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 4 days, 12 hrs ago -
Handbook (2)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 5 days, 11 hrs ago - more...
|
2010-05-23
, 06:12
|
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#2
|
This has been mentioned for years but never completely corrected, unfortunately
 |
|
2010-05-23
, 06:16
|
|
Posts: 518 |
Thanked: 334 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ italy
|
#3
|
Originally Posted by geneven
why not? its really impossible to get an app and know all bout it without opening the wiki here!
This has been mentioned for years but never completely corrected, unfortunately
 |
|
2010-05-23
, 06:40
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#4
|
Hi,
What I'd suggest is that when a program is promoted to Extras-testing, place a comment saying that the description could be improved (but don't thumb down - description, barring the mention of whether it's a CLI app, isn't in the QA Checklist) - you'll reach far more people that way
Originally Posted by santiago
TBH, if a person knows their application should be optified, they'll just do it instead of writing a comment...
and finally we need more details about the app installation, not all the apps with the icons are optifyed, before to install them, we really wanna know if is it or not optifyed.
What I'd suggest is that when a program is promoted to Extras-testing, place a comment saying that the description could be improved (but don't thumb down - description, barring the mention of whether it's a CLI app, isn't in the QA Checklist) - you'll reach far more people that way
|
|
2010-05-23
, 06:50
|
|
Posts: 345 |
Thanked: 467 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Germany
|
#5
|
Originally Posted by santiago
Stop complaining here and just get involved. Prepare a perfect description and submit it to the authors of the app in question or even better file it as a patch request in the apps tracker (all apps in extras are required to have one). And wait for the app to get updated.
hi guys, with this tread i want to tell u that all the times that i open the repos, all the software descriptions are very poor... i post some examples
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Master of Gizmo For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2010-05-23
, 07:12
|
|
Posts: 1,187 |
Thanked: 816 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Australia
|
#6
|
If you don't understand it, don't download it.
|
|
2010-05-23
, 10:45
|
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#8
|
Originally Posted by leetut
i have no idea.
whos claire?
and whats repositoryes?
__________________
if i did help you, just click "Thanks" on the lower right of my post. thanks!
"The best way to break a Spell is to prevent it from being cast in the first place"
N900: 1000/1150mhz; sampling_rate 15; up_threshold 150000;
if i did help you, just click "Thanks" on the lower right of my post. thanks!
"The best way to break a Spell is to prevent it from being cast in the first place"
N900: 1000/1150mhz; sampling_rate 15; up_threshold 150000;
|
|
2010-05-23
, 10:48
|
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 154 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#9
|
Originally Posted by santiago
Because nobody is paying for the people to do their stuff here. Nobody is their boss, and no-one can force them to do anything. They do it if they wish to do it.
why not? its really impossible to get an app and know all bout it without opening the wiki here!
The only option would be to cut "unpolished" apps out from repos completely, and I'm not sure you would want that? (I'm sure I don't).
 |
|
2010-05-23
, 10:50
|
|
Posts: 909 |
Thanked: 216 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Bremen, Germany
|
#10
|
i partly agree. some descriptions are a little misleading or unclear.
i like the idea of writing a better description yourself and sending it to the author, but i'm afraid that wont always help.
i once wrote a mail to the author of the personal ip adress app asking for an update with a new feature (disconnect existing connection when you click the widget). i did get an answer that a new version is on the way... that was 2 month ago.
i mean, no one is forced to do something, but i was disappoint xD
also, i dont get what this promotion-system is for. i was told when a program gets promoted to extras, it is a safe, working and optiffied program.. now there are some (or at least 1) app that are not optified, but they still made it to extras.
i like the idea of writing a better description yourself and sending it to the author, but i'm afraid that wont always help.
i once wrote a mail to the author of the personal ip adress app asking for an update with a new feature (disconnect existing connection when you click the widget). i did get an answer that a new version is on the way... that was 2 month ago.
i mean, no one is forced to do something, but i was disappoint xD
also, i dont get what this promotion-system is for. i was told when a program gets promoted to extras, it is a safe, working and optiffied program.. now there are some (or at least 1) app that are not optified, but they still made it to extras.
description of a game: you need the original games files... ok, but all the times i have to see here in the talk the how to section to play a new game!?!?
description of some apps 1ist case: there's not description in some cases
description of some apps 2nd case: this is an app to modify/find/take/get what?!?!
i think, that in some cases, we users need more details. i mean details like:
description like this: with this app your device can edit the pictures, or the text files, or can emulate something (are just examples)
and finally we need more details about the app installation, not all the apps with the icons are optifyed, before to install them, we really wanna know if is it or not optifyed.
be clair just in those points and your work 'll be really perfect, now you are wasting it.
thanks to follow this thread
thanks to all the developers that write more details in the apps
thanks to the nutella chocolate to support my heart
Last edited by santiago; 2010-05-23 at 06:04.