Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#1
Some bugs are getting ridiculous rants and inappropriate comments that only makes a hell for the people who want to look the facts instead of the rants.

I am suggesting a really strict policy: 1 month ban for first piece of noise created and 1 year ban for second.

Any thoughts? comments? if my suggestion is stupid, contribute your better vesion!
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ossipena For This Useful Post:
fnordianslip's Avatar
Posts: 670 | Thanked: 359 times | Joined on May 2007
#2
I think your escalation rate is a bit too high

Perhaps day->week->month->year may be slightly more forgiving.
__________________
Class .. : Lame hacker & beardy boffin
Humour . : [#######---] Alignment: Apathetic anarchist
Patience : [####------] Weapon(s): My cat, my code.
Agro ... : |#---------] Relic(s) : N900, MacBookPro, NSLU2, N800, SheevaPlug, Eee-901, Core2-Quad, PS3
"In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not."
--
Beware of extras-devel.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to fnordianslip For This Useful Post:
RevdKathy's Avatar
Posts: 2,173 | Thanked: 2,678 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Cornwall, UK
#3
The idea is absolutely sound, but I'd be a bit softer on the execution. There are people around here who don't realise that's not what bugzilla is for. I suggest something more educational like:

1st offense: a strongly worded email
2nd offense: a week long exclusion (which actually most ranters won't notice)
3rd offense: exclusion from filing bugs unless or until the bug-squad are satisfied of bona fide intent to file properly.

I wouldn't actually install an appeals system. The bug-people (careful choice of words there) don't need the extra hassle. Reversal of exclusion would only be in highly exceptional circumstances. I do think the squad should have the authority to overturn a permanent exclusion if they see fit.

Finally, I'd add a reminder on the filing page saying "Is this a bug or a rant? If a bug, please be concise. If a rant, pleas see Nokia forums."
__________________
Hi! I'm Kathy and I'm a Maemo Greeter! Welcome.
Useful links for newcomers: New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Did you know Meego.com has forums too?
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to RevdKathy For This Useful Post:
benny1967's Avatar
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#4
in general yes, there should be some kind of mechanism to keep rants an "me toos" low; banning somebody on the 1st offence is not the way to do it. they might be people who just dont know how to contribute to a bug system and didn't mean to do bad. also, all of us have a bad hair day every now and then... even the OP.

my major concern, though, is if it's the right time now to invest effort in a new policy for bugs.maemo.org.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,729 | Thanked: 388 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Canada
#5
if this will stop my dilemma of receiving too much e-mails from the bug that i voted then please do so.....
__________________
if i did help you, just click "Thanks" on the lower right of my post. thanks!

"The best way to break a Spell is to prevent it from being cast in the first place"

N900: 1000/1150mhz; sampling_rate 15; up_threshold 150000;
 
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#6
Originally Posted by ossipena View Post
Some bugs are getting ridiculous rants and inappropriate comments that only makes a hell for the people who want to look the facts instead of the rants. I am suggesting a really strict policy: 1 month ban for first piece of noise created and 1 year ban for second. Any thoughts? comments? if my suggestion is stupid, contribute your better vesion!
I think that, while your suggestion is sound, what you really want is incarceration followed by corporal punishment. Just think of how effective it will be and how much fun you will have whipping people you do not like (a.k.a. "ranters") in front of a crowd. And when you get tired of the spectacle, you can always go waterboard some t.m.o characters (a.k.a. "trolls").
 

The Following User Says Thank You to fms For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#7
Originally Posted by benny1967 View Post
my major concern, though, is if it's the right time now to invest effort in a new policy for bugs.maemo.org.
Yeah, it may be a bit too late for that. It seems like Nokia is slowly winding down bugs.maemo.org involvement (what there was of it at any rate) and it will soon be used mainly for extras.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post:
lcuk's Avatar
Posts: 1,635 | Thanked: 1,816 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ Manchester, England
#8
Originally Posted by ossipena View Post
Some bugs are getting ridiculous rants and inappropriate comments that only makes a hell for the people who want to look the facts instead of the rants.

I am suggesting a really strict policy: 1 month ban for first piece of noise created and 1 year ban for second.

Any thoughts? comments?
sigh

people rant because they feel passionate enough about something to talk about it.
give clear examples of dramatically wrong posts and deal on a case by case basis

being draconian and swinging a banhammer will not win any users over.
emphasise the good sides and push those users to put their passion into the system in different ways.

if my suggestion is stupid, contribute your better vesion!
go and read bugtrackers on sites all over the world.
I was just reading a tracker which had a rant from someones girlfriend flaming linux for taking him away from her.
Should she be banned for a year?

ie - the bugtracker is sound and does not need an over the top policy such as this
it just needs more people to help to cure the issues

get involved and look at the immense amount of Open Source code that CAN be worked on and fixed by this community.
start here:

http://maemo.gitorious.org
__________________
liqbase sketching the future.
like what i say? hit the Thanks, thanks!
twitter.com/lcuk
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lcuk For This Useful Post:
Posts: 968 | Thanked: 974 times | Joined on Nov 2008 @ Ohio
#9
I agree with everybody else, a little too strict, and too fast. Besides before you complain about people breaking rules and the resulting punishments, you should probably make sure you aren't breaking any either.

Signatures

* Signatures should only be in small or normal fonts (size 1 or 2).
* Singatures may only contain up to five lines of text (measured from a 1280 pixel width screen).
* Links in signature are allowed but you may not link to warez, porn, racist or other similar hate sites.
1 Want to know something?
2 K.I.S.S. approach:
3 wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
4
5 If the link doesn't help, just use
6 Google Custom Search
__________________
*Consumer*, not a developer! I apologize for any inconvenience.
My script to backup /home and /opt
Samsung Galaxy S Vibrant, Huawei S7, N900(retired), N800(retired)
 
ndi's Avatar
Posts: 2,050 | Thanked: 1,425 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Bucharest
#10
Draconic, even for me.

Many people ramble on with obviously good intentions. They think they help adding their own experiences.

IMO, a 72 font warning every login would do more. "Bugzilla is not a forum. Each message generates mail. Keep it shoort and useful".
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.

Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ndi For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:56.