Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#321
Originally Posted by momcilo View Post
You and gerbick might have agreed, but not me.

But if you provide open source drivers I don't mind calling you a CEO.
I'll meet you halfway and do a Nokia for you and I'll just promise them... someday.
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#322
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
I'll meet you halfway and do a Nokia for you and I'll just promise them... someday.
No, no, no, you're doing it wrong!

First you have to be completely silent on the subject. Eventually, when people begin to notice and start asking for code, spend years discussing the process for opening instead of the opening requests themselves. Then make people jump through hoops and repeat the same requests in different ways, assign a community member to process the new requests, but ignore his recommendations. Then, when you haven't really satisfied any of the requests but most of them can be ticked off because they have become irrelevant through obsolescence, pretend everything's fine except perhaps a couple of cases that won't be satisfied for "business reasons". Then pronounce the platform dead, give it a new name and a paint job and tell people to start all over again there. Then hold a meeting with the community council and tell them you can still open some stuff up, if only the requests could be a bit more compelling. Finally, pull out of the new platform before you even release a product.
 

The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post:
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#323
Originally Posted by lma View Post
No, no, no, you're doing it wrong!

First you have to be completely silent on the subject. Eventually, when people begin to notice and start asking for code, spend years discussing the process for opening instead of the opening requests themselves. Then make people jump through hoops and repeat the same requests in different ways, assign a community member to process the new requests, but ignore his recommendations. Then, when you haven't really satisfied any of the requests but most of them can be ticked off because they have become irrelevant through obsolescence, pretend everything's fine except perhaps a couple of cases that won't be satisfied for "business reasons". Then pronounce the platform dead, give it a new name and a paint job and tell people to start all over again there. Then hold a meeting with the community council and tell them you can still open some stuff up, if only the requests could be a bit more compelling. Finally, pull out of the new platform before you even release a product.
GENIUS!

Here's a story in pictures:

__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#324
Originally Posted by lma View Post
<SNIP>First you have to be completely silent on the subject. Eventually, when people begin to notice and start asking for code, spend years discussing the process for opening instead of the opening requests themselves. Then make people jump through hoops and repeat the same requests in different ways, assign a community member to process the new requests, but ignore his recommendations. Then, when you haven't really satisfied any of the requests but most of them can be ticked off because they have become irrelevant through obsolescence, pretend everything's fine except perhaps a couple of cases that won't be satisfied for "business reasons"<SNIP>
Gold! This bit, sounds a lot like stock Android too.
Cept they've never promised the same level of openness from the outset.
So it doesn't look as bad...

Still, on-balance, MeeGo is apparently doing better than Android.
http://www.visionmobile.com/research.php#OGI
But clearly not up to the standard we were all originally led to believe.

This may be an opportunity to get some folk to chime-in to a thread I started a while ago.
http://forum.meego.com/showthread.php?t=4087

Last edited by jalyst; 2011-08-11 at 09:21.
 
Posts: 673 | Thanked: 856 times | Joined on Mar 2006
#325
Screenshots of UI from last tabco video:
http://is.gd/qJOOJD
http://is.gd/iwfeua
http://is.gd/L5XVPQ

Waiting for danramos to release some more material before Monday!

Last edited by momcilo; 2011-08-11 at 18:01.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to momcilo For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#326
Originally Posted by momcilo View Post
Screenshots of UI from last tabco video:
http://is.gd/qJOOJD
http://is.gd/iwfeua
http://is.gd/L5XVPQ

Waiting for danramos to release some more material before Monday!
Overhyped crap it seems not even sure its linux/meego. But we dont need yet another development framework so I hope its Qt based...
 
Daneel's Avatar
Posts: 549 | Thanked: 698 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#327
If its the else, its not qt.
 
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#328
Yaaaaaaawwwwnnn.......
These guys are so going to be laughed at if they don't deliver.
Switching to weekly subscription for this thread.
We'll finally know how **** it is by then.

Last edited by jalyst; 2011-08-11 at 18:59.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post:
Posts: 673 | Thanked: 856 times | Joined on Mar 2006
#329
Originally Posted by Daneel View Post
If its the else, its not qt.
Does it use gtk+/GNOME as a framework?
 
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#330
Originally Posted by momcilo View Post
Does it use gtk+/GNOME as a framework?
Well then I hope its HTML5.

If Gtk+ I say write apps in C is way off 2011.

C is nice language for lowlevel stuff but def. not for appwriting.
 
Reply

Tags
fusion garage, grid 10, internet tablet, move along, nothing to see, tabco, tablet talk, whoistabco


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:19.