Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 86 | Thanked: 164 times | Joined on Oct 2010
#21
Originally Posted by Radu View Post
I think many .NET fans/developers will want to develop for WP7, because it's so easy to port their applications to it.
For the end user, I have no idea. I do not like an animated tiles desktop. Too cluttered, and at the same time too empty (you can have only a few applications visible at once, rather than tens of smaller icons).
I think I remember reading somewhere that Microsoft will not be using .Net for windows8 or wp8.

http://forums.create.msdn.com/forums/t/84244.aspx

oh look, these people heard the same thing.
 
F2thaK's Avatar
Posts: 4,365 | Thanked: 2,465 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Australia Mate
#22
 

The Following User Says Thank You to F2thaK For This Useful Post:
Posts: 572 | Thanked: 259 times | Joined on Jan 2011
#23
microsoft should from HP and give up.

u know when u are selling ur stuff for much cheaper than competitions things are not OKAY, and still not selling well.
 
Posts: 1,680 | Thanked: 3,681 times | Joined on Jan 2011
#24
Nothing, it is the worst selling smart phone OS available.
__________________
N900: One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to vi_ For This Useful Post:
debernardis's Avatar
Posts: 2,142 | Thanked: 2,051 times | Joined on Dec 2006 @ Sicily
#25
Lots of people buy according to the hype, to the desire of novelty, to word of mouth from friends and colleagues, to aesthetics and to the contrasting forces that are feeling different from others and feeling part of a homogeneous group. This to answer to the OP.

So, many will buy WP once available. Only a minority will base their purchase on some kind of rationality.

Here in this forum instead this minority is majority, hence comes all the opposition to Elop, to Microsoft, to Google, whatever.
Just my 2 eurocents.
__________________
Ernesto de Bernardis

 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to debernardis For This Useful Post:
Posts: 46 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Jan 2011 @ AU/MY
#26
I bought one just to try it out. Honestly with the Nodo update its crap. It has a very beautiful UI, but apart from that I don't see it replacing my N900 anytime soon.

The only plus side I could say is the Zune Music services (the $15/month for unlimited songs).
 
Posts: 55 | Thanked: 76 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#27
I bought a WP7 because its fun to use. My N900 frustrated me more and more and apps didn't get better UIs although qt has the power. Sorry, but UIs like this are not appealing to the masses:
http://meego.de/apps/maemo/sonstige-...euro-2012.html
And there are plenty of them in the N900 universe. They work, but deliver a horrible user experience.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to johnny_knoe For This Useful Post:
shallimus's Avatar
Posts: 568 | Thanked: 969 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Toronto
#28
Thanks all for the replies. I realise it's a loaded question round here, but I do genuinely want to understand the answer, if only so I can know why Nokia has not only shot itself in the foot but also pretended that all the cool kids will want holes in their feet too.
__________________
tinfoilhat.dll: Trojan horse detected
Sailfish want list: calendar bugfixes, glanceable agenda, Swype or similar
Evolution continues (but we're still pre-Cambrian)

 
coderedcomputing's Avatar
Posts: 152 | Thanked: 53 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ West Virginia
#29
Keep in mind that the average user is not someone on here. When joe average walks into a phone provider's store and is already not sold on buying an iPhone, they are going to get a salesman-pitch on phones. When they hear a phone runs Windows, and they use Windows at home... blammo huge selling point.
__________________
Raw data transfer EP found at EP2.
Image(s) flashed successfully in 28.609 s (8946 kB/s)!
 
qwazix's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 2,621 | Thanked: 5,429 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#30
obviously it's not. Otherwise they wouldn't be a total failure for a year now. It's a nice little software but it delivers nothing more than S40 on better hardware. Or samsungs touchiz (the S8000 Jet software, it even had backrounding).
There are no native apps, the upside is that all apps look similar (and nice IMO) but you'll never see fennec or opera mobile, or RaceChrono on it unless they allow native apps. For now it's just a phone that can run silverlight. BTW, maybe we can compile moonlight and run them on the N900 too.
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:36.