Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (0)
to General by Kalatti - 2 days, 9 hrs ago -
Extra softwares in Sailfish using CLI, repositories, etc (117)
to SailfishOS by nieldk - 4 days, 6 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 5 days, 3 hrs ago - more...
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to HLing For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2012-11-16
, 18:58
|
|
Posts: 491 |
Thanked: 299 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
@ Pordenone IT
|
#2
|
mine looks like the one on the left and i'm sure it's not fake
i have 16GB ITA
Last edited by lorenzo; 2012-11-16 at 19:26.
i have 16GB ITA
Last edited by lorenzo; 2012-11-16 at 19:26.
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lorenzo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-11-16
, 19:26
|
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Nov 2012
|
#4
|
(Oh yay! Thanks both of you! Indeed, the one on the left is the 64G and the right, 16G. so, it is indeed a difference in design perhaps.)
edit: uh oh, I misread Lorenzo's direction. So, then, the left one is what you both have. hmmm.
another question: does the 64G's black display appears a bit dark purple (eggplant) instead of black, like on the 16G?
Last edited by HLing; 2012-11-16 at 19:29.
edit: uh oh, I misread Lorenzo's direction. So, then, the left one is what you both have. hmmm.
another question: does the 64G's black display appears a bit dark purple (eggplant) instead of black, like on the 16G?
Last edited by HLing; 2012-11-16 at 19:29.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HLing For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-11-16
, 20:23
|
|
Posts: 55 |
Thanked: 138 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ Bulgaria
|
#5
|
Originally Posted by HLing
I don't think anyone is interested in producing such a high-quality fake Nokia N9. If another company manages to produce such a masterpiece again they will brand it with their name
I'm curious to find out if it's a change in Nokia's production, or if one of the unit is a fake....Thanks for your input in advance!
Btw I hope that Jolla will soon reveal such device Nokia Lumia 800 is very similar as hardware to N9 so they might be using a similar pipeline and same hardware components. I guess that Nokia might have made some minor improvements to the hardware during the manufacturing process and that can explain the minor differences on your newer device.
 |
|
2012-11-16
, 21:25
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#7
|
white (64GB): lens looks like on the right
the two flash LEDs are clearly visible, fairly close to the "surface"
check your IMEI...
the two flash LEDs are clearly visible, fairly close to the "surface"
check your IMEI...
__________________
information is a necessary though no sufficient condition to rationality...
information is a necessary though no sufficient condition to rationality...
 |
|
2012-11-16
, 21:44
|
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 217 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Netherlands
|
#8
|
my 16GB looks like the left one, blue-ish shine in the lens, and hardly visible flashleds.
edit: cat /proc/cpuinfo tells me its a RM696, revision 1603.
hope it helps
Last edited by XiliX; 2012-11-16 at 21:57.
edit: cat /proc/cpuinfo tells me its a RM696, revision 1603.
hope it helps
Last edited by XiliX; 2012-11-16 at 21:57.
 |
|
2012-11-16
, 22:02
|
|
Posts: 198 |
Thanked: 150 times |
Joined on May 2012
|
#9
|
mine is like the one on the left with blue-ish lens (if you look closely, it has two black layers before the lens) and two visible flashleds, it is 16G black and definitely original N9
I have acquired a 16G N9 first (Nokia RM-696 board, Revision 1603), and was learning its ways. I liked it and wanted to get a 64 G (Nokia RM696 board, Revision 1601) one for myself. Aside from other difference in what came with the device, a noticeable difference is in the physical camera lens itself. I'm posting the picture in hopes of finding some answers here. I'm curious to find out if it's a change in Nokia's production, or if one of the unit is a fake....Thanks for your input in advance!
Last edited by HLing; 2012-11-18 at 22:50. Reason: Added Hardware and Revision info