Reply
Thread Tools
Naranek's Avatar
Posts: 236 | Thanked: 149 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Finland
#1
I recently installed an OS on a USB flash drive, and it works pretty well. I used the standard installation procedure without any tricks, and the installer even asked if I wanted to encrypt my home directory. Now I have a USB stick I can put in just about any computer, and it'll just boot up with my OS installs the required drivers on the go. I'm pretty sure this is next to impossible with Windows and OS X systems, which lead me thinking, that what other things are there that you can do only with Linux*?

I think that SSH-connections are also quite magical. They are easily routed through firewalls, secure, and you can do pretty much anything through a tunnel. After battling many days and nights with Windows VPN, I'd choose SSH over it any time I know you can get a SSH server in windows too, but it isn't nearly as easy and convenient as in Linux.

I know that here lurk people wise in the ways of the Linux. What else can you think of?

*with Linux I mean all Linux based distributions, not the kernel. Go pick your nit somewhere else
 
zehjotkah's Avatar
Posts: 2,361 | Thanked: 3,746 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Berlin - Love this city!!
#2
One thing only possible with Linux: having a clean conscience.
 
jedi's Avatar
Posts: 1,411 | Thanked: 1,330 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Tatooine
#3
You can use it to fix Windoze...
 
Posts: 2,829 | Thanked: 1,459 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Finland
#4
install normal desktop OS to usb-memory...hmm sounds not so good idea if you use it daily :| (maybe tweaked version would be good)
__________________
TMO links: [iSpy] - [Power search] - [Most thanked] - [Cordia - Maemo5 UI on top MeeGo Core] - [CommunitySSU]
 
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#5
In theory, you can modify programs yourself because their inner workings should be easy to view, something you can't do with proprietary programs.

By the same token, some developer can make modifications in programs. When it was discovered that the N800 had an FM Radio chip, it took about one day for someone to implement it so we could listen to FM radio! Now, imagine you had a phone that had an FM Radio chip and the environment was Windows or a Mac. Can you imagine that in one day it would be usable? I can't.
__________________
All I want is 40 acres, a mule, and Xterm.
 
volt's Avatar
Posts: 1,309 | Thanked: 1,187 times | Joined on Nov 2008
#6
With Linux, I can spend more time trying to figure something out, than using it. That's great, except I dun wanna.
 
Posts: 1,463 | Thanked: 1,916 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Edmonton, AB
#7
i use it to run the only disk recovery tool that makes any sense to me: GNU Ddrescue

There's all sorts of drivers and utilities that only run under linux
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPPcgN6PawU&t=0m45s&hd=1
http://www.aircrack-ng.org/doku.php?...bility_drivers

Hardware that runs better on linux:
http://www.dd-wrt.com/site/index
http://www.handlewithlinux.com/faste...tric-superbike

And this just makes me mad:
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/ps3...ack,10035.html (i still have 3.15 firmware on mine)


if you need some ideas:
http://lifehacker.com/tag/linux/?p=1&replies=collapsed

Last edited by Creamy Goodness; 2010-11-18 at 23:10.
 
Posts: 490 | Thanked: 191 times | Joined on May 2010
#8
You can have wireshark + aircrack-ng suite = hell. For example, you can read msn messenger chat packets(even possible on n900) or get yourself a wifi access. You can create a fake AP with the spoofed mac address and name while drinking coffee at some cafe.You can disconnect wifi clients in the crowded areas. >
 
Posts: 186 | Thanked: 79 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#9
Windows doesn't support raw sockets (from xp service pack 2 i think). So no way to use some network tools like nmap. Well, it still works but is unreliable.

Another thing is packet injection. It is impossible on windows with most NIC that linux have no problem with.

Also you can run computer without antivirus software. You are sparing lots of resources.

Above is true not only for linux but most unix based systems.
 
Posts: 2,102 | Thanked: 1,309 times | Joined on Sep 2006
#10
Originally Posted by geneven View Post
In theory, you can modify programs yourself because their inner workings should be easy to view, something you can't do with proprietary programs.

By the same token, some developer can make modifications in programs. When it was discovered that the N800 had an FM Radio chip, it took about one day for someone to implement it so we could listen to FM radio! Now, imagine you had a phone that had an FM Radio chip and the environment was Windows or a Mac. Can you imagine that in one day it would be usable? I can't.
+1 to this. You can look at and change the code for a program you use (in most cases). This is the real appeal for me at least.

Indeed the same is also true of the OS - I use Ubuntu and for some reason Qt programs crash when you click on them, but someone worked out what the problem was (to do with xinerama) and released a patch, which I have then applied and I'm back in business. While I'm not overly impressed with the speed of Ubuntu at picking up this patch, at least I can do something about it myself, which wouldn't be possible with closed systems.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:52.