Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (0)
to General by Kalatti - 1 day, 2 hrs ago -
Extra softwares in Sailfish using CLI, repositories, etc (117)
to SailfishOS by nieldk - 2 days, 23 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 3 days, 20 hrs ago - more...
|
2012-09-20
, 12:26
|
|
Posts: 535 |
Thanked: 598 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
@ Republic of the Philippines
|
#2192
|
@hardkorek
how do we do that? won't we have any problems/conflicts?
thanks in advance!
edit: @guilledoc, seems like we posted the same question at the same time.
Last edited by vetsin; 2012-09-20 at 12:33.
how do we do that? won't we have any problems/conflicts?
thanks in advance!
edit: @guilledoc, seems like we posted the same question at the same time.
Last edited by vetsin; 2012-09-20 at 12:33.
| The Following User Says Thank You to vetsin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-09-20
, 19:20
|
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
@ INDIA
|
#2193
|
Originally Posted by pinochio
Forgotten original flash player 10 for Maemo 5.
The package comes directly from Nokia.
http://www.sendspace.pl/download/YTo...F34vasd3245bvs
Flash Player version 10,1,98,88. (10.2).
hey buddy thanks alot !!! its amazing dude.....a big thanks ..
y donmt you help out for java tooo if u can like this of adobe
its too boring for the xterminal works
 |
|
2012-09-21
, 09:37
|
|
Posts: 283 |
Thanked: 276 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
@ uk or @Pai,Mae Hong Son, Thailand
|
#2194
|
Originally Posted by pinochio
For me, this doesn't work on youtube videos that are embedded in facebook. Ok when direct on facebook. Anyone else seeing that?
Forgotten original flash player 10 for Maemo 5.
The package comes directly from Nokia.
http://www.sendspace.pl/download/YTo...F34vasd3245bvs
Flash Player version 10,1,98,88. (10.2).
|
|
2012-09-21
, 10:06
|
|
Posts: 1,100 |
Thanked: 2,797 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
@ Netherlands
|
#2195
|
Originally Posted by guilledoc
The deb install file will move the old libflashplayer.so to libflashplayer.so.diverted. This file (/usr/lib/browser/plugins/libflashplayer.so.diverted) can be removed (or stored as backup somewhere else).
Is it safe?
how doI remove it?
|
|
2012-09-21
, 10:26
|
|
Posts: 244 |
Thanked: 354 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Scotland
|
#2196
|
Originally Posted by macey
H/W accell was removed on the Linux Flash 11 for whatever reason. As such, I'm using an old Flash 10.4 installer on my Ubuntu 12.04 box which I then hex-edited the installed lib and changed the revision to v12. With this, Flash reports v12 to Facebook and - golly gosh - the videos play okay and I also benefit from H/W accell (your mileage may vary, I'm using an ATI card, NVidia is flaky as fook on Linux + Flash).
For me, this doesn't work on youtube videos that are embedded in facebook. Ok when direct on facebook. Anyone else seeing that?
So - the point to all this chat - if you hex-edit the Flash10 lib and change the version to 12 then I suspect you'll then be able to view Youtube videos.
|
|
2012-09-21
, 10:55
|
|
Posts: 283 |
Thanked: 276 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
@ uk or @Pai,Mae Hong Son, Thailand
|
#2197
|
Originally Posted by gregoranderson
I have done this successfuly previously (0x005b61fc in libflashplayer.so to 31 31 2E 32 20 72 32 30 32
......
So - the point to all this chat - if you hex-edit the Flash10 lib and change the version to 12 then I suspect you'll then be able to view Youtube videos.
(11.2 r 232).
was 31 30 2E 31 20 72 36 31 (00)
So, if I want to edit to v12, does it have to be V12, release {something}? for example? 12.1 r 14
What did you do?
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to macey For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-09-21
, 11:41
|
|
Posts: 244 |
Thanked: 354 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Scotland
|
#2198
|
Originally Posted by macey
Well, I changed the version for my Linux box to v12 by increasing the major version and leaving the revision ; just so I wouldn't have to keep doing it (Adobe will no longer product a version of Flash that uses the GPU in Linux).
I have done this successfuly previously (0x005b61fc in libflashplayer.so to 31 31 2E 32 20 72 32 30 32
(11.2 r 232).
was 31 30 2E 31 20 72 36 31 (00)
So, if I want to edit to v12, does it have to be V12, release {something}? for example? 12.1 r 14
What did you do?
You can change the N900 version to whatever you like (11, 12, 13, 99) - given a new version will never be produced
|
|
2012-09-21
, 12:11
|
|
Posts: 283 |
Thanked: 276 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
@ uk or @Pai,Mae Hong Son, Thailand
|
#2199
|
Originally Posted by gregoranderson
Yes, changed to V12 r92, works fine on f/book embedded youtube.
......
You can change the N900 version to whatever you like (11, 12, 13, 99) - given a new version will never be produced
May cange to V99.. Later, after checked other sites.
Thanks again.
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to macey For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-09-21
, 13:55
|
|
Posts: 242 |
Thanked: 169 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#2200
|
Originally Posted by macey
Did you change it by tweak flash plugin? It seems it does not recognize version number properly...
Yes, changed to V12 r92, works fine on f/book embedded youtube.
May cange to V99.. Later, after checked other sites.
Thanks again.
What about hardware acceleration? Do you notice performance increase on N900, setting version 12.xx ?
 |
| Tags |
| adobe, adobe flash, blahblah, flash, flash 10, flash 10.1, fremantle, future, idiotic thread, maemo, maemo 5, nokia, nokia fails, update |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:58.
how doI remove it?