Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1,163 | Thanked: 1,873 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ The Netherlands
#2381
@estel: did you see my post too? I have KP, CSSU_T and busybox-power and reboot works. Except I got a bootup poput of: unexpected reboot, your kernel config is NOT Loaded. Default is used instead
 
Estel's Avatar
Posts: 5,028 | Thanked: 8,613 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#2382
to be honest, I saw Your post, just haven't commented, cause I have no idea what may be causing this, or if it is in any way related to bug we're discussing.

Common sense tells me, that Your reboot may fail in earlier part (before it's "finished" properly, so device act as it's unexpected), but it's pure assumption.
__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!
 
panjgoori's Avatar
Posts: 1,236 | Thanked: 1,278 times | Joined on Aug 2011 @ Balochistan
#2383
my default kernel is not loading anymore after installing kernel power and multiboot. whenever i press 0 to load default maemo kernel but it gives guru mediation error. does anyone knows why its happening ?
 
Posts: 1,163 | Thanked: 1,873 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ The Netherlands
#2384
Originally Posted by Estel View Post
to be honest, I saw Your post, just haven't commented, cause I have no idea what may be causing this, or if it is in any way related to bug we're discussing.

Common sense tells me, that Your reboot may fail in earlier part (before it's "finished" properly, so device act as it's unexpected), but it's pure assumption.
Yes exactly what I thought, but don't think it's strange that my device does reboot while most of the other have issues and the device just shuts down...

This bug is really legendary
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mr_pingu For This Useful Post:
Posts: 273 | Thanked: 463 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Athens
#2385
Originally Posted by Tousif zeba View Post
I have got a problem installing kp49.......
I am currently having kp48 and kp48 boot image but when updating to kp49 it says can't update conflcting with application package kp48 boot image

and when i try to update kp49 bootimage it says can't update as kp49 breaks third party software policy.......

plz help
I had the same problem
apt-get upgrade in console solves it
 
Posts: 306 | Thanked: 38 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Austria
#2386
hi,
i have tested my device after a power-cycle (with battery removal).
the results are more than depressing. i can't say that kp49 is 100% responsible for this.
so if it's so, sorry for off topic, but maybe someone can help me to get a working device back.

i have charged my device till 19:00, the battery lasts till 04:00
9 hours in offline mode with obviously no cpu usage and no usage

what the hell is going on with me device?



i performed powertop befor testing, the output seems more than nice:
Code:
Nokia-N900:~# powertop
Powertop 1.13.3
status: Unknown job: pmtrackerdaemon
Sleeping for 11 seconds before sampling
Collecting data for 30 seconds
Sample interval was 00m 30s 6226us

C#      | Ratio  | Avg/dura | Frequency | Ratio
--------+--------+----------+-----------+--------+
     C0 |   0.4% |          |  1150 MHz |   nan% |
     C1 |   0.1% |    0.4ms | 
     C2 |   3.0% |    5.6ms | 
     C3 |   6.3% |   72.1ms | 
     C4 |  90.2% | 1690.7ms | 

IRQ#    | Activity   | Type           | Name
--------+------------+----------------+---------------------------
     12 |        398 |           INTC | DMA
     56 |        152 |           INTC | i2c_omap
     37 |         90 |           INTC | gp
     57 |         50 |           INTC | i2c_omap
     86 |         17 |           INTC | mmc1
    202 |         17 |           GPIO | wl1251
     11 |         10 |           INTC | prcm
     21 |          9 |           INTC | SGX

PID#    | Activity   | Name           | Function Entry (Expire)
--------+------------+----------------+---------------------------
      0 |         30 |  <kernel core> | hrtimer_start (tick_sched_timer)
      0 |         27 |  <kernel core> | tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick (tick_sched_timer)
    744 |         22 |         wl12xx | schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
   2098 |         19 |     osso-xterm | schedule_hrtimeout_range (hrtimer_wakeup)
      1 |         15D|        preinit | cpufreq_governor_dbs (delayed_work_timer_fn)
    744 |         10 |         wl12xx | queue_delayed_work (delayed_work_timer_fn)
    869 |          9 |      bme_RX-51 | sys_timer_settime (posix_timer_fn)
     45 |          3 |          mmcqd | queue_delayed_work (delayed_work_timer_fn)
   1186 |          3 |           Xorg | queue_delayed_work (delayed_work_timer_fn)
    744 |          3 |         wl12xx | schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
   1511 |          3 |       wlancond | ieee80211_ioctl_siwpower (ieee80211_dynamic_ps_timer)
    869 |          3 |      bme_RX-51 | schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
    826 |          3 |           dsme | do_nanosleep (hrtimer_wakeup)
    826 |          3 |           dsme | __enqueue_rt_entity (sched_rt_period_timer)
      1 |          3D|  <kernel core> | queue_delayed_work (delayed_work_timer_fn)
   1139 |          2 |       sgx_perf | queue_delayed_work (delayed_work_timer_fn)
    869 |          2 |      bme_RX-51 | do_nanosleep (hrtimer_wakeup)
    853 |          2D|<kernel module> | queue_delayed_work (delayed_work_timer_fn)
     14 |          1 |        pdflush | journal_get_write_access (commit_timeout)
      1 |          1 |  <kernel core> | inet_initpeers (peer_check_expire)
   2113 |          1 |       powertop | do_nanosleep (hrtimer_wakeup)

Power domain activity breakdown
Domain  | % of time spent in states
--------+---------+---------+---------+---------+----------
usbhost |OFF: 100%|RET:   0%|INA:   0%| ON:   0%| now:(OFF)
    sgx |OFF:  97%|RET:   0%|INA:   0%| ON:   2%| now:(OFF)
    per |OFF:   0%|RET:   0%|INA:   0%| ON: 100%| now:(ON)
    dss |OFF: 100%|RET:   0%|INA:   0%| ON:   0%| now:(OFF)
    cam |OFF: 100%|RET:   0%|INA:   0%| ON:   0%| now:(OFF)
   core |OFF:   0%|RET:   0%|INA:   0%| ON: 100%| now:(ON)
   neon |OFF:  90%|RET:   6%|INA:   2%| ON:   0%| now:(ON)
    mpu |OFF:  90%|RET:   6%|INA:   2%| ON:   0%| now:(ON)
   iva2 |OFF:   0%|RET:   0%|INA:   0%| ON: 100%| now:(ON)

Clock activity breakdown at end of period
Domain  | Active clocks
--------+---------------+---------------+------------------
   iva2 |         IVA2
   core |          SDRC | HSOTGUSB_IDLE |      OMAPCTRL 
        |     MAILBOXES |
   wkup |          GPT1 |       32KSYNC |         GPIO1 
        |          WDT1 |           SR1 |           SR2 
        |
  ckgen |          CORE |          PERI |           96M 
        |           48M |           12M |           54M 
        |      EMU_CORE |
    per |         GPIO2 |         GPIO3 |         GPIO4 
        |         GPIO5 |         GPIO6 |

Total wakeups   908,  30.3/s | IRQ  743,  24.8/s | Timers  165,   5.5/s
HW wakeups       10,   0.3/s |     Real gp_timers expired   90,   3.0/s

Last edited by StocChr; 2011-11-30 at 07:07.
 
Straycat's Avatar
Posts: 218 | Thanked: 59 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ spain
#2387
Originally Posted by StocChr View Post
hi,
i have tested my device after a power-cycle (with battery removal).
the results are more than depressing. i can't say that kp49 is 100% responsible for this.
so if it's so, sorry for off topic, but maybe someone can help me to get a working device back...
Well, for me the KP49 is the best version at the moment on battery life.

And I've played all versions until this.

I can get 2/5 days of barely use, wifi and 3G powered off most of the time. For example, I recharged the device late night on monday and I'm on 23% of battery charge remaining.

In my case was KP48 the battery beast. So far that I had to go back to KP47 and upgraded from it to KP49 where I am so happy.
__________________
God Bless The Blues!!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Straycat For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,960 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#2388
Originally Posted by Sourav.dubey View Post
When karam is going to update battery patch
my battery sucks after installing kpv49
I am not sure if I will scream or cry if this sh|t is mentioned once more in this thread.
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
corduroysack's Avatar
Posts: 939 | Thanked: 366 times | Joined on Dec 2010 @ U.K.
#2389
kp49 is great and so is my battery life using dsp profile
__________________
"I Reject Your Reality & Substitute My Own" Adam Savage
 
Posts: 1,523 | Thanked: 1,997 times | Joined on Jul 2011 @ not your mom's FOSS basement
#2390
Originally Posted by Sourav.dubey View Post
When karam is going to update battery patch
my battery sucks after installing kpv49
Please refrain from posting battery/speedpatch related crap in this thread. This is about kernel-power and nothing else. If your standby time etc. sucks, complain either to karam or trisha02, not here. Comprende?
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to don_falcone For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
battery-status, bq27x00_battery, kernel, kernel-power, misiak4king, noobs-cant-read, pali4president, patches, readdirections, revolverspinyou

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:15.