Reply
Thread Tools
erendorn's Avatar
Posts: 738 | Thanked: 983 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ London
#351
Given what is said in the thread (ovi QA results and other), and the apparent issues with the code, I would at least remove the download link from the competition website, so as not to endorse the use of the application. But not necessarily remove the entry alltogether.

Then it's up to the jury to judge the program, and what has been admittedly improved by the submitter during the competition time.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to erendorn For This Useful Post:
zehjotkah's Avatar
Posts: 2,361 | Thanked: 3,746 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Berlin - Love this city!!
#352
Just have seen, that he first released this "app" on 12-31-10, 01:49 PM (date of thread).
I fail to see any improvements since then, as there is only a link to the sourceforge page which is dated 30.12.2010.

So I'd say it disqualifies just because it wasn't developed within the Coding Competition timeframe stated in the rules. What do you think?

If anyone does have a little bit spare time, it would be nice to check the other submissions regarding this criteria as well (and report them here if there are any) to stay fair.

Thanks!
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to zehjotkah For This Useful Post:
marxian's Avatar
Posts: 2,448 | Thanked: 9,523 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Wigan, UK
#353
Originally Posted by zehjotkah View Post
Just have seen, that he first released this "app" on 12-31-10, 01:49 PM (date of thread).
I fail to see any improvements since then, as there is only a link to the sourceforge page which is dated 30.12.2010.

So I'd say it disqualifies just because it wasn't developed within the Coding Competition timeframe stated in the rules. What do you think?
Good point. Looks like we've got him on a technicality.
__________________
'Men of high position are allowed, by a special act of grace, to accomodate their reasoning to the answer they need. Logic is only required in those of lesser rank.' - J K Galbraith

My website

GitHub
 

The Following User Says Thank You to marxian For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,086 | Thanked: 2,964 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#354
Just noticed that the list of rules for this year's competition is tiny compared to the iron fist authoritarian list of rules I brought in on last year's entry. I always fancied being a dictator Makes me think, though, that we should incorporate some of these extra old rules into this year's comp (for example the no mutiple account voting or the change freeze during the voting stage) along with any new ones we'd feel is appropriate. It's a lot easier to get them sorted out now, the earlier the better.
__________________
Follow me on my neglected twitter @kojacker

Cybot950 - Control a robot with your N9/N950
SMSPetFeeder - Build a Bluetooth/SMS dog feeder with Qt, N950, and arduino
Nerf950 - Use your N9/N950 to fire a Nerf gun
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to kojacker For This Useful Post:
zehjotkah's Avatar
Posts: 2,361 | Thanked: 3,746 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Berlin - Love this city!!
#355
this years voting will be based on the "ecosystem" () used for the maemo community council voting.
so I think it's pretty safe against cheating, but of course I'll take a look at the old rules.
Thanks!
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to zehjotkah For This Useful Post:
Posts: 63 | Thanked: 139 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#356
Just submitted my entry, Ghosts Overboard, a collect items game controlled by tilting the device.

I didn't come up with a good new idea, so I recycled the idea and graphics from a never-released desktop game I made two years ago. Because of the chain of changes resulting from a move from keyboard to tilt control and the horrible design choises of the original version (it was slow even on the desktop I had back then), I decided to rewrite the new code from scratch.

Since the original game was never released, I assumed this one would not be considered a "port" and wrote nothing on the existence of the old one in the competition entry. I'll be happy to change that, though, if required.
 
zehjotkah's Avatar
Posts: 2,361 | Thanked: 3,746 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Berlin - Love this city!!
#357
Everything fine!
Thanks a lot!
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zehjotkah For This Useful Post:
zehjotkah's Avatar
Posts: 2,361 | Thanked: 3,746 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Berlin - Love this city!!
#358
donation update:
10 € by (no nickname specified, please send me a PM if you want to be listed with your nickname)

Thanks!
see all donations made so far at http://wiki.maemo.org/MeeGo_Coding_C...ity_Prize_Fund

Last edited by zehjotkah; 2011-06-20 at 14:23.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zehjotkah For This Useful Post:
zehjotkah's Avatar
Posts: 2,361 | Thanked: 3,746 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Berlin - Love this city!!
#359
we won't get any Nokia "N950" for the MeeGo Coding Competition but all participants are encouraged to apply for such a device with their project.
 

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to zehjotkah For This Useful Post:
Posts: 213 | Thanked: 414 times | Joined on Nov 2010
#360
Ive just updated my space invaders submission and changed the platform to 'Both' as i now have a Meego OBS account. The i586 package is completely untested as i dont have a device, so if anyone wants to try it out, let me know how it goes.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to piggz For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
coding, community, competition, contest, development, intel, meego, meetmeego, nokia


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:06.