Reply
Thread Tools
Faz's Avatar
Posts: 284 | Thanked: 80 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ London, UK
#1
Interesting piece from Mobile News.

Nokia: networks may reject N900

September 4, 2009

By Devika Sen-Gupta

Nokia said networks may be discouraged from selling the N900 internet tablet, as menus cannot be customised

Nokia said the N900 will not sell as well as its other devices, as networks will be discouraged to stock it.

Nokia executive vice president Kari Tuutti told Mobile News the N900 user interface cannot be customised to include network applications, which will be a bone of contention with the networks.

As a result, Nokia may find it difficult to form network partnerships for the internet tablet, Tuutti said.

Tuutti said: "We have a good, long lasting relationship with the networks, but we understand that they may not be happy with the user interface because it cannot be customised."

Nokia executive vice president and general manager of multimedia Anssi Vanjoki also hinted sales may not be encouraging as the N900 is the fourth generation internet tablet out of Nokia's five generation programme.

Vanjoki said, although the N900 is "great product", further innovation is still to come to create a fifth evolution in internet tablet devices.

Vanjoki said: "In 2004 I announced a five-step programme with five generations of software evolution that will come with what will be the next generation of computers.

"The Nokia 770 was the first step, the N900 is the fourth. We have one step to go before we will have what we believe is the future of computers."
 

The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Faz For This Useful Post:
Posts: 49 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Apr 2007
#2
This sounds like a real dumb part on Nokia and also now makes the chance of getting a subsidised T-Mobile N900 a very slim option. Way to go Nokia get our hopes up in the US and the crush it at the same time.
 
Posts: 271 | Thanked: 220 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#3
I find it curious that Nokia is claiming that the menu's "can't" be customized...when the whole point of Maemo is its near-infinite extensibility and malleability. Sounds like a case of "don't want to water down our flagship with your network-specific crapware" than "can't be done" to me.
 

The Following 24 Users Say Thank You to texaslabrat For This Useful Post:
benny1967's Avatar
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#4
maybe "customizing" in this context means:

putting items there that the user cannot remove.
 

The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post:
debernardis's Avatar
Posts: 2,142 | Thanked: 2,054 times | Joined on Dec 2006 @ Sicily
#5
... or deleting items that corporation do not like: voip, bluetooth obex maybe.
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to debernardis For This Useful Post:
barry99705's Avatar
Posts: 641 | Thanked: 27 times | Joined on Apr 2007
#6
Originally Posted by JayOnThaBeat View Post
Very disturbing... I always thought Ma'Bell loved us
Nope, just our money.
__________________
Just because you are online, doesn't mean you don't have to form a full sentence.


SEARCH! It's probably already been answered.
 
Posts: 40 | Thanked: 16 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Massachusetts, USA
#7
Does this mean the Gen 5 will be carrier crippled? If so, then I'm more then happy to get Gen 4 (N900).
 
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#8
It's interesting how they have to broadcast this fact now. I guess all carrier negotiations have ceased already and they're hoping to rally the interwebs to do some word of mouth marketing with "open platform vs carrier cartels" mantra of some sort.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post:
ARJWright's Avatar
Posts: 861 | Thanked: 734 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Nomadic
#9
At least in this respect Nokia has come out to be honest on this. Its not even so much that they cannot do it, but its pretty much against their model of use for Linux/Maemo to have the kinds of breakages that carriers usually encourage.

That being said, it would sound as if the context of the conversation was in respect to the N900 being added directly to a carrier deck (where about 80% of mobiles tend to be seen and sold to users). That would be a reason to address this, and a reason still that Nokia continues to make Symbian devices look more attractive to carriers (which they are doing).
--

The other side of this issue has to put some kind of onus on governments, carriers, and wireless associations. If carrier technology is so dependent on specialized IP that firmware needs to always be modified, what kind of real compeition can take place on the side of technology and processes?

Not saying that its not a competitive advantage to have a better codec or radio-language than someone else running a similar network. But it would seem quite counterproductive to the entire industry to prevent the kinds of innovation that would endear people to more willingly spend money on top of and through their networks.

EDIT: What more does it say for carriers who are reporting profits, but don't have in place the open source think/do-tanks that are able to take devices like the N900 and actively support them. That again speaks to some kind of inepitude that really should be talked about a bit more.

To me, something really wrong with that kind of level of politics.
---

The interesting part will be if there is anything in the way of active blocking or throttling of the N900 on some networks once users go to carriers to purchase data plans only, and then utilize VoIP services heavily. Some nations will certainly have networks who are up and arms about this, and then bend laws or terms of services accordingly. But then, you will have a few networks/carriers who will welcome this - as an excuse to beef things up, or move to wider-service technologies.

The N900 in this wise can be a very disruptive device.

EDIT: Does anyone here have the ability to play a part in that disruptive role?

Last edited by ARJWright; 2009-09-04 at 18:51.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ARJWright For This Useful Post:
benny1967's Avatar
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#10
Originally Posted by mjc View Post
Does this mean the Gen 5 will be carrier crippled? If so, then I'm more then happy to get Gen 4 (N900).
or gen 2/3. remember why people said they wanted a tablet, not a phone?
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
carrier, n900, networks, nokia v. cell carrier war, operator, telco

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:16.