Reply
Thread Tools
krisse's Avatar
Posts: 1,540 | Thanked: 1,045 times | Joined on Feb 2007
#1
Webkit is now powering quite a lot of browsers:

-Default browser on all Nokia Symbian S60 devices
-Just about to become default browser on all Nokia Series 40 devices
-Default browser on all Samsung Symbian S60 devices
-Default browser on all Sony Ericsson Symbian S60 devices
-Default browser on iPhone and iPod Touch
-Default browser on Macintosh computers
-Core of Google's Chrome browser

In the mobile world at least, it looks like Webkit is now unstoppable. The majority of phones (including high end, mid range and low end) will probably be using Webkit in one or two years time. If you factor in the ubiquity of mobile devices, Webkit could well become the most used browser in the world.

Obviously desktop computing is totally different, that's a race between Internet Explorer and Mozilla Firefox.

Should Maemo adopt Webkit for its default browser? I'm not sure what to think because Maemo is so in-between being a desktop computer and a mobile device.

But maybe we should have a discussion about the relative merits of Maemo switching to a default browser powered by Webkit?

Last edited by krisse; 2009-05-16 at 03:25.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to krisse For This Useful Post:
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#2
No.

They've already got a browser team (getting a new one is big money), and they've got plans for XUL.

Really, though, the differences between the two engines are less than you think (and as a side note, I've discovered that the S60 browser sucks).
__________________
Ryan Abel
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,213 | Thanked: 356 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ California and Virginia
#3
Mobile is dominated by webkit and opera. Desktop is dominated by Firefox (XUL) and Internet Explorer. Really, they are basically all the same. It is just that webkit is lighter, so it runs better on phones (IMO). However, the new processors like the OMAP3 are so beastly, that it really won't make a difference like it does on the N810.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------

www.ezschool.com - The best online educational experience.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Thesandlord For This Useful Post:
krisse's Avatar
Posts: 1,540 | Thanked: 1,045 times | Joined on Feb 2007
#4
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
They've already got a browser team (getting a new one is big money)
Well, what would be the relative merits of using Webkit and Mozilla assuming Maemo was starting from scratch?


(and as a side note, I've discovered that the S60 browser sucks).
I don't think it's that bad! :-) Browsing on my 5800 is pretty much like browsing on my N810, same sort of speed, same sort of page rendering abilities. Did you actually try the browser on a 5800? It's a lot faster and a lot easier to use than it was on previous S60 models.

But in any case, discussing S60 is all a red herring: I'm not suggesting that Maemo should use the S60 browser, I'm asking whether Maemo's default browser should use the Webkit engine.

Even if you hate Webkit, it looks like it will become the most commonly used browser engine in the mobile internet world, and possibly the most commonly used on the internet in general. If that happens a lot of sites may be written with Webkit-based browsers in mind. Surely that warrants at least a little bit of our attention when discussing Maemo's future?

It's not even a quality issue necessarily. Windows might suck but you'd be crazy to ignore it if you're a software publisher. :-)
 
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#5
(note: specuation based only on public knowledge follows)

I really hope the 'beastly' Cortex A8 can run Fennec well enough, and the Mozilla team (with the help of Nokia thru things like the upcoming Danish hackfest) can bang it into usable shape in short order. I can't help wondering if the browser is one of the hold-ups for Fremantle's final release...

My biggest beef with all the engines out there is that nobody's bothered to make an optimized ARM Javascript engine. All the optimization has happened on the x86 platform.

krisse: Do you think Opera isn't a contender for the mobile space any more?
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 
Posts: 161 | Thanked: 99 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#6
Originally Posted by qole View Post
My biggest beef with all the engines out there is that nobody's bothered to make an optimized ARM Javascript engine. All the optimization has happened on the x86 platform.
https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/w...il/007253.html
 

The Following User Says Thank You to iskarion For This Useful Post:
Bundyo's Avatar
Posts: 4,708 | Thanked: 4,649 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Bulgaria
#7
As I've said it before: an update to FF engine and ARM JIT will do wonders. + The WebKitGtk is still some steps away from being a complete WebKit engine like its brother backends in Mac/Windows. Even the QT version is still not completely up to date, though much better. Of course all that can be fixed if a company wants to.

FF on the other hand is a complete engine with a lot of potential because of its easy extendability with XUL and Javascript.

So no from me.
__________________
Technically, there are three determinate states the cat could be in: Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bundyo For This Useful Post:
Bundyo's Avatar
Posts: 4,708 | Thanked: 4,649 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Bulgaria
#8
Originally Posted by krisse View Post
Even if you hate Webkit, it looks like it will become the most commonly used browser engine in the mobile internet world, and possibly the most commonly used on the internet in general. If that happens a lot of sites may be written with Webkit-based browsers in mind. Surely that warrants at least a little bit of our attention when discussing Maemo's future?

It's not even a quality issue necessarily. Windows might suck but you'd be crazy to ignore it if you're a software publisher. :-)
I think you're a little off on that one. Probably WebKit only sites will target only iPhone and S60. WM6.5 is coming out in some months and it features WebKit IE6 engine...
__________________
Technically, there are three determinate states the cat could be in: Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
 
Bundyo's Avatar
Posts: 4,708 | Thanked: 4,649 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Bulgaria
#9
Originally Posted by krisse View Post
-Default browser on all Nokia Symbian S60 devices
-Just about to become default browser on all Nokia Series 40 devices
-Default browser on all Samsung Symbian S60 devices
-Default browser on all Sony Ericsson Symbian S60 devices
-Default browser on iPhone and iPod Touch
-Default browser on Macintosh computers
-Core of Google's Chrome browser
The sum of these is about how much compared to PC + WM?

I'm not against WebKit though. I'm for reality and sensibility.
__________________
Technically, there are three determinate states the cat could be in: Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Bundyo For This Useful Post:
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#10
Originally Posted by krisse View Post
Well, what would be the relative merits of using Webkit and Mozilla assuming Maemo was starting from scratch?
Not a huge difference, really. WebKit is a cleaner and lighter codebase but recent releases of both engines perform very similarly, and WebKit lacks features that Nokia needs (XUL and such).

Either way, we aint starting from scratch and replacing the whole browser team is an expensive proposition. Besides, think of the money Nokia is putting into MicroB as an investment in Mozilla's mobile side. Competition is good. Do you really think we'd be where we are with JS engines without it?


Originally Posted by krisse View Post
I don't think it's that bad! :-) Browsing on my 5800 is pretty much like browsing on my N810, same sort of speed, same sort of page rendering abilities. Did you actually try the browser on a 5800? It's a lot faster and a lot easier to use than it was on previous S60 models.
Yes, I own a 5800. It's slower and much less usable than MicroB (although some of this is attributable to the poor interface).

Originally Posted by krisse View Post
Even if you hate Webkit, it looks like it will become the most commonly used browser engine in the mobile internet world, and possibly the most commonly used on the internet in general.
I don't hate WebKit (in fact, I'm a fan of it and really don't care all that much for FireFox), and as for most common, who cares? IE is the most commonly used browser, should we consider that one too?

Originally Posted by krisse View Post
If that happens a lot of sites may be written with Webkit-based browsers in mind. Surely that warrants at least a little bit of our attention when discussing Maemo's future?
What's to write for for WebKit? CSS text shadows? This isn't the era of IE where the developer writes in a bunch of proprietary features to their rendering engine. We have standards (and browsers which largely comply with them), these days it really doesn't matter much which engine you use. The fatal assumption you're making is that anybody is going to overcome IE in the short term.
__________________
Ryan Abel
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:06.