Active Topics
-
Paths (0)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 17 hrs, 9 mins ago -
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (4)
to General by teroyk - 18 hrs, 18 mins ago - more...
thedead1440 |
2012-07-21
, 10:07
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 6,215 |
Thanked: 6,400 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#21
|
waspy so the flashing with pr_legacy_280 didnt work it out for you?
|
|
2012-07-21
, 10:42
|
|
Posts: 23 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jul 2012
|
#22
|
Originally Posted by thedead1440
Nope, still "failing to flash". It's really weird as like I said in my first post, it happily flashed the UK image before, and prior to that it would show the Nokia logo when plugged in.
waspy so the flashing with pr_legacy_280 didnt work it out for you?
|
|
2012-07-21
, 11:06
|
|
Posts: 28 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Philippines
|
#23
|
Hmm, does it have any "Property Of Nokia" logo/prints on it?
Apparently I got a Lumia 900 with that same logo on it from my uncle who works in Nokia. It's illegal to use it in public?
Apparently I got a Lumia 900 with that same logo on it from my uncle who works in Nokia. It's illegal to use it in public?
|
|
2012-07-21
, 11:10
|
|
Posts: 23 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jul 2012
|
#24
|
Originally Posted by uzernamezz
No logo, no, although there isn't much room for logos on the N9, it's a unibody! I don't think it's illegal to use it in public, engineers have to test these things and that is what they do; my friend lives with his handsets for a while and reports back on software bugs and problems, making suggestions on improvements etc.
Hmm, does it have any "Property Of Nokia" logo/prints on it?
Apparently I got a Lumia 900 with that same logo on it from my uncle who works in Nokia. It's illegal to use it in public?
|
|
2012-07-21
, 11:29
|
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#25
|
Originally Posted by waspy
Engineers (or rather their employers) obtain special test licences from their local regulatory authorities in order to do so. Unless you also have one of those it is illegal to operate a non-certified cellular device.
I don't think it's illegal to use it in public, engineers have to test these things and that is what they do
|
|
2012-07-21
, 11:32
|
|
Posts: 23 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jul 2012
|
#26
|
Originally Posted by lma
Interesting, I didn't know that. Still leaves me stuck with this handset though!
Engineers (or rather their employers) obtain special test licences from their local regulatory authorities in order to do so. Unless you also have one of those it is illegal to operate a non-certified cellular device.
|
|
2012-07-21
, 15:18
|
|
Posts: 164 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Jun 2012
|
#27
|
I had litle problem like this...but i solved quick, i flashed duo boot kernel for nitdroid, then i reflashed without nitdroid duoboot and went fine...maybe you should try it..or try switzerland rom that the phone will recognise as update i guess bcz of 009 over 001 number you got already on phone.
 |
|
2012-07-21
, 16:00
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#28
|
Originally Posted by lma
Exactly. It is as illegal as using a GSM jammer. "Might actually get you into prison"-illegal (depending on country and motives of course)
Engineers (or rather their employers) obtain special test licences from their local regulatory authorities in order to do so. Unless you also have one of those it is illegal to operate a non-certified cellular device.
|
|
2012-07-22
, 09:32
|
|
Posts: 646 |
Thanked: 1,124 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Espoo, Finland
|
#29
|
Depending on the realities of local legislation, you may also try to claim that the act of purchase is void and null and you want your money back: you bought for a faulty device, not an unsoldable one.
|
|
2012-07-22
, 09:52
|
|
Posts: 23 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jul 2012
|
#30
|
Originally Posted by minimos
Yeah I'm trying to pursue this avenue right now but the seller is a bit thick so it's difficult trying to communicate the exact problem. It was via eBay so I am protected (I would assume anyway), I'll raise it with them next week I expect.
Depending on the realities of local legislation, you may also try to claim that the act of purchase is void and null and you want your money back: you bought for a faulty device, not an unsoldable one.
These sort of refunds take ages though so I was rather hoping to simply sort the device out and get it working and avoid the hassle but if it hasn't got a certified radio etc then perhaps that is the way forward.