Active Topics
-
Extra softwares in Sailfish using CLI, repositories, etc (117)
to SailfishOS by nieldk - 1 day, 4 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 2 days, 1 hr ago - more...
 |
Feathers McGraw |
2016-09-04
, 20:25
|
|
Posts: 654 |
Thanked: 2,368 times |
Joined on Jul 2014
@ UK
|
#41
|
Originally Posted by r0kk3rz
If you're going to try that, might as well convince Nokia to make another N900
|
|
2016-09-04
, 20:46
|
|
Posts: 440 |
Thanked: 2,256 times |
Joined on Jul 2014
|
#42
|
Originally Posted by Feathers McGraw
at least Sony still make phones...
If you're going to try that, might as well convince Nokia to make another N900
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to r0kk3rz For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2016-09-05
, 08:37
|
|
Posts: 334 |
Thanked: 2,004 times |
Joined on Oct 2013
@ Fin
|
#43
|
Originally Posted by t-b
It is possible to make calls with @locusf's SailPi.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eaiNsFhtI8
Would be interesting to see a project like this done with a raspberry pi zero and a nice 3d printed case.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rPMGvapXVyE
But as phone it is not ready.
Raspberry Zero has armv6 so would SFOS port be even possible ?
__________________
necunos.com - Join the movement for freedom of mobile
necunos.com - Join the movement for freedom of mobile
 |
|
2016-09-05
, 09:38
|
|
Posts: 1,478 |
Thanked: 9,871 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
@ Shanghai / London
|
#44
|
I have had this idea for a long time.
I know a lot of ODMs who can provide nice ID and good spec devices. However there are other issues needs to be solved, which I think only a healthy and big co-operation can do, not in the scale can be done by our community.
For example,
- SW development. Specific System-level engineer with SFOS and Alien Dalvik, yes the ODM can work with Jolla but in house engineer is definitely needed.
- QC, who's going to do that?
- Warranty management? Spare parts?
- The most importantly, who's going to pay for the upfront cost? Including all the certification etc. If on average, a device costs £200 (You really don't want another mid-low end device do you?) and quantity is 5k (ODM wouldn't really be interested to spend time and effort for quantity less than this, also considering certification etc lower the number isn't cost effective. ) So that's about 1M of upfront cost, who can pay that? And how to make sure that those device can be sold? How to prove to customers or Dave999 that this is not a scam?
PS: I think I can solve the first 3 with my company, but for the last point, there seem to be no solution...
I know a lot of ODMs who can provide nice ID and good spec devices. However there are other issues needs to be solved, which I think only a healthy and big co-operation can do, not in the scale can be done by our community.
For example,
- SW development. Specific System-level engineer with SFOS and Alien Dalvik, yes the ODM can work with Jolla but in house engineer is definitely needed.
- QC, who's going to do that?
- Warranty management? Spare parts?
- The most importantly, who's going to pay for the upfront cost? Including all the certification etc. If on average, a device costs £200 (You really don't want another mid-low end device do you?) and quantity is 5k (ODM wouldn't really be interested to spend time and effort for quantity less than this, also considering certification etc lower the number isn't cost effective. ) So that's about 1M of upfront cost, who can pay that? And how to make sure that those device can be sold? How to prove to customers or Dave999 that this is not a scam?
PS: I think I can solve the first 3 with my company, but for the last point, there seem to be no solution...
|
|
2016-09-05
, 09:45
|
|
Posts: 1,478 |
Thanked: 9,871 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
@ Shanghai / London
|
#46
|
Originally Posted by pichlo
If we are seriously building something, QC is needed. You don't want to end up with hardware broken component fails or RF not working....
QC? In a community project? Surely you are joking, Mr Chen!
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to chenliangchen For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2016-09-05
, 10:23
|
|
Posts: 6,445 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#47
|
Originally Posted by chenliangchen
I know. That was my point.
If we are seriously building something, QC is needed.
__________________
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2016-09-05
, 10:39
|
|
Posts: 764 |
Thanked: 2,888 times |
Joined on Jun 2014
|
#48
|
Originally Posted by chenliangchen
Well, there's always crowdfunding... I actually think it wouldn't be such a bad idea. Just show that the company has a good history and is able to produce those devices with or without the crowdfunders' money. Explain that the reason for the upfront crowdfunding payment is that it only makes sense to produce from 5k devices onwards, otherwise you would run at a loss. No endless options, just 'this is what you get, if you don't want it, don't fund it'. No 'if we reach this goal, you get this extra'. Of course, if certain options like device colour wouldn't affect the production costs, they can be included. And naturally, an 'unsuccessful crowdfunding = money back' guarantee, but I think with the necessary publicity this could attract the critical mass required for success.
The most importantly, who's going to pay for the upfront cost? Including all the certification etc. If on average, a device costs £200 (You really don't want another mid-low end device do you?) and quantity is 5k (ODM wouldn't really be interested to spend time and effort for quantity less than this, also considering certification etc lower the number isn't cost effective. ) So that's about 1M of upfront cost, who can pay that? And how to make sure that those device can be sold? How to prove to customers or Dave999 that this is not a scam?
|
|
2016-09-05
, 16:20
|
|
Posts: 337 |
Thanked: 891 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
@ Royaume Uni.
|
#49
|
Originally Posted by chenliangchen
If you got 500 people willing to pay upfront, I think you would be doing well...
- The most importantly, who's going to pay for the upfront cost? Including all the certification etc. If on average, a device costs £200 (You really don't want another mid-low end device do you?) and quantity is 5k (ODM wouldn't really be interested to spend time and effort for quantity less than this, also considering certification etc lower the number isn't cost effective. ) So that's about 1M of upfront cost, who can pay that? And how to make sure that those device can be sold? How to prove to customers or Dave999 that this is not a scam?
Honestly, I think going down the hardware route is a bad idea. It nearly bankrupted Jolla twice (phone and tablet), the Neo900 project is 3 years old and still nothing, etc.
I think it would be better to take an existing piece of hardware and get a build of Sailfish that works 100% on it. I know there are lots of community ports, but they always seem to get abandoned with some key functions of the phone not working or stable.
|
|
2016-09-05
, 16:37
|
|
Posts: 702 |
Thanked: 2,059 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ UK
|
#50
|
Originally Posted by nthn
I really don't see the point in something that old and underpowered.... hence this thread.
If the port issues with the keyboard layout and some other issues can be solved, I expect there will be a sudden surge in second hand Xperia Mini Pros sold - even though it has an old processor and not a lot of RAM. For anyone interested, there are a lot of Xperia Mini Pros being sold on the Polish and Portuguese versions of OLX.