Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 64 | Thanked: 109 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#71
Originally Posted by bennypr0fane View Post
http://veskuh.blogspot.co.at/2011/12...07324311692186

The maintainer of Nemo package for Helium says a new release for fremantle would make sense. Any takers?
Marmistrz, maybe you could clarify if the work by rburchell listed on their github is included in the current fremantle build?
Thanks, Ben
Hey. I just made diff of "veskuh / HeliumReborn" for Nemo and sources that I have. They are same. So answer to your question is: Helium for Maemo5 is build from same sources as Nemo version.

But trust nobody and compare them yourself.
Grab tarball from here:
http://maemo.org/packages/source/vie...browser/2.0-1/

Last edited by mauron85; 2013-03-15 at 12:21.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mauron85 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 466 | Thanked: 335 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Vienna, Austria
#72
Originally Posted by mauron85 View Post
Hey. I just made diff of "veskuh / HeliumReborn" for Nemo and sources that I have. They are same.
Well the last changes to the Nemo version listed in Github are from rburchell, not veskuh:
https://github.com/nemomobile/heliumreborn
You used this package: https://github.com/veskuh/HeliumReborn ?
I don't know if it's the same as packages listed on the latter site.
Please forgive me for not comparing the source myself as you suggest. I don't know how to go about reading code and it'd just be useless to try
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bennypr0fane For This Useful Post:
Posts: 64 | Thanked: 109 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#73
My bad. I though you're programmer. I've also compared rburchell repo.
This is how it can be done:
Code:
$ git clone https://github.com/nemomobile/heliumreborn
$ wget http://repository.maemo.org/extras-devel/pool/fremantle/free/source/h/heliummobilebrowser/heliummobilebrowser_2.0-1.tar.gz
$ tar -zxvf heliummobilebrowser_2.0-1.tar.gz
$ diff -qr heliumreborn/src/ heliummobilebrowser-2.0/src/
In this case diff - the compare program didn't found any significant diferrence.
It means the rburchell Nemo repo is pretty much same code as we have for Maemo5.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mauron85 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 466 | Thanked: 335 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Vienna, Austria
#74
It seems that not a lot of work has been done on Helium for half a year or so - apparently it's not much of a priority to Nemo developers.
...switching my attention back to the current tinkering in progress @Fennec, 2 promising new builds are coming up
Will keep an eye on Helium though, who knows if maybe the Nemo devs will present new builds as soon as tomorrow!
 
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#75
Originally Posted by bennypr0fane View Post
It seems that not a lot of work has been done on Helium for half a year or so - apparently it's not much of a priority to Nemo developers.
...switching my attention back to the current tinkering in progress @Fennec, 2 promising new builds are coming up
Will keep an eye on Helium though, who knows if maybe the Nemo devs will present new builds as soon as tomorrow!
fennec isn't webkit, and mobile sites on non-webkit suck... try iphone user agent on microb.
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 
Posts: 466 | Thanked: 335 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Vienna, Austria
#76
Originally Posted by marmistrz View Post
fennec isn't webkit, and mobile sites on non-webkit suck... try iphone user agent on microb.
It's actually rare that I prefer to view the mobile version of a site on N900 over the desktop version.
To me, most mobile sites suck in any browser!
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to bennypr0fane For This Useful Post:
Posts: 578 | Thanked: 994 times | Joined on Dec 2012
#77
It's good browser, but why sometimes it's not responding at once for scrolling? Is there any chance to implement tab switcher?
 
w00t's Avatar
Posts: 1,055 | Thanked: 4,107 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Norway
#78
Originally Posted by bennypr0fane View Post
It seems that not a lot of work has been done on Helium for half a year or so - apparently it's not much of a priority to Nemo developers.
there is a lot to do around Nemo, and not a lot of people working on it. i don't think anyone will deny that having a good web browser would be nice.

Originally Posted by bennypr0fane View Post
Will keep an eye on Helium though, who knows if maybe the Nemo devs will present new builds as soon as tomorrow!
if you want to start sending patches, feel free. by no means should you wait for someone else to do the work for you - you might be waiting a long while
__________________
i'm a Qt expert and former Jolla sailor (forever sailing, in spirit).
if you like, read more about me.
if you find me entertaining, or useful, thank me. if you don't, then tell me why.
 
Posts: 466 | Thanked: 335 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Vienna, Austria
#79
Originally Posted by w00t View Post
there is a lot to do around Nemo, and not a lot of people working on it. i don't think anyone will deny that having a good web browser would be nice.
if you want to start sending patches, feel free. by no means should you wait for someone else to do the work for you - you might be waiting a long while
I have geared my mind for the prospect of having to wait for a long time. However, that still might turn out a shorter wait than the one for the day I learn to code - and then learn it well enough to contribute to this project. When that day comes, however, I'll get cracking on this first thing!
 
nokiabot's Avatar
Posts: 1,974 | Thanked: 1,834 times | Joined on Mar 2013 @ india
#80
Any recent builds for helium ?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to nokiabot For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:56.