Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (3)
to General by Kalatti - 16 hrs, 52 mins ago - more...
|
2011-02-02
, 14:55
|
|
Posts: 840 |
Thanked: 823 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#2
|
Originally Posted by AgogData
Not sure why it's being kept back but the change log and dependencies for libeet1 are here so you can decide whether it is important or not
In xterm typing apt-get upgrade showed that i have a package named "libeet1" being held back, so i typed apt-get install libeet1
and it said that it need a dependencies named "libeina1"
so i typed apt-get install libeina1 but its a large package of about 16 MB, so is it important to upgrade libeet1 ? and why its kept back ?
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...1.4.0-1maemo1/
|
|
2011-02-02
, 15:05
|
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#3
|
Originally Posted by Cue
It's being kept back because upgrading it would require installing new packages (rather than just upgrading existing installed packages). You need to use "install" to force it to go ahead with the upgrade & new installs.
Not sure why it's being kept back
| The Following User Says Thank You to Rob1n For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2011-02-02
, 15:12
|
|
Posts: 491 |
Thanked: 341 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ LA
|
#4
|
Same issue:
apt-get install libeet1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libeet1: Depends: libeina1 (>= 1.0.0~beta) but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages
|
|
2011-02-02
, 15:18
|
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#5
|
Originally Posted by xxxxts
Then libeina1 must conflict - probably with libeina0. You'll need to try install that manually (which should then remove any conflicting packages).
Same issue:
 |
|
2011-02-02
, 15:18
|
|
Posts: 870 |
Thanked: 133 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#6
|
I did and it manually and it removed bluemaemo and alot of packages i don't know if its important or not.
@xxxxts : apt-get install libeina1
@xxxxts : apt-get install libeina1
 |
|
2011-02-02
, 19:48
|
|
Posts: 168 |
Thanked: 206 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Finland
|
#7
|
Add this to /etc/apt/preferences file if you don't want get notification during apt-get upgrade.
Don't know if new version is needed somewhere. If yes, then unpin file and install required files.
Last edited by Gusse; 2011-02-02 at 20:31.
Code:
Package: libeet1 Pin: version 1.2.2* Pin-Priority: 1001
Last edited by Gusse; 2011-02-02 at 20:31.
|
|
2011-02-03
, 11:20
|
|
Posts: 491 |
Thanked: 341 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ LA
|
#8
|
Shucks, now I lost BlueMaemo.
|
|
2011-02-03
, 11:46
|
|
Posts: 840 |
Thanked: 823 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#9
|
it seems some people are having problems installing bluemaemo now
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=603
most likely because of libeet1?
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=603
most likely because of libeet1?
|
|
2011-02-03
, 12:39
|
|
Posts: 491 |
Thanked: 341 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ LA
|
#10
|
How can I fix what I have done?
and it said that it need a dependencies named "libeina1"
so i typed apt-get install libeina1 but its a large package of about 16 MB, so is it important to upgrade libeet1 ? and why its kept back ?