|
2010-12-30
, 16:48
|
Posts: 388 |
Thanked: 842 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Finland
|
#2
|
The Following User Says Thank You to hqh For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-12-30
, 16:54
|
Posts: 41 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#3
|
If you get a "poor" chip, there's nothing you can do about it except change it for another one. With a device like this it would practically mean changing the entire device.
|
2010-12-30
, 17:12
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#4
|
|
2010-12-30
, 17:13
|
Posts: 701 |
Thanked: 585 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, England
|
#5
|
|
2010-12-30
, 17:41
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#6
|
Might I ask why this is the case? And is there any remedy if, say, the ideal or ulv clocking profile renders one's n900 unstable? Any further kernel tweaks that can make it work?
For instance, it seems to me that some people simply type "kernel-config load ideal" and live happily ever after, while others struggle to make ulv work with 800 Mhz. What differences (e.g., build quality, quirks in hardware, etc.) make the latter "unlucky".