Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 176 | Thanked: 262 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Texas, USA
#11
Yes, I tested this on a N900. I wouldn't have posted these packages without doing so.

Originally Posted by marmistrz View Post
Is there any reason to use Glib 2.22 rather than 2.26?
Size, but even then it is a very marginal difference. I first got 2.22 compiled and then 2.26 so I went ahead and posted both packages.

A glib newer than 2.26 is not on my TODO list. Anyone else is free to give it a shot.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mooninite For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#12
Originally Posted by mooninite View Post
Yes, I tested this on a N900. I wouldn't have posted these packages without doing so.



Size, but even then it is a very marginal difference. I first got 2.22 compiled and then 2.26 so I went ahead and posted both packages.

A glib newer than 2.26 is not on my TODO list. Anyone else is free to give it a shot.
I noticed that there's a gtk segfault with 2.26, while launching leafpad. With 2.22 there's no problem.
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to marmistrz For This Useful Post:
Posts: 284 | Thanked: 161 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#13
incompaible application package?? any info?
 
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#14
Originally Posted by shady View Post
incompaible application package?? any info?
You need to use dpkg
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#15
mooninite: why didn't you include libglib2.0-data?
This may be the cause of some problems with 2.26.
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 
Posts: 112 | Thanked: 30 times | Joined on Jun 2012 @ Jeddah,Saudi Arabia
#16
Originally Posted by shady View Post
incompaible application package?? any info?
same problem with me

Originally Posted by marmistrz View Post
You need to use dpkg
how to use it
commands please
 
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#17
Originally Posted by unexpected View Post
same problem with me



how to use it
commands please
Code:
sudo dpkg -i <path to glib>
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 

The Following User Says Thank You to marmistrz For This Useful Post:
Posts: 112 | Thanked: 30 times | Joined on Jun 2012 @ Jeddah,Saudi Arabia
#18
in the first post,there are many links (binary,dev.debug,etc)
which one i should download+install to run firefox 14?
 
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#19
Originally Posted by unexpected View Post
in the first post,there are many links (binary,dev.debug,etc)
which one i should download+install to run firefox 14?
You need binary only.
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 

The Following User Says Thank You to marmistrz For This Useful Post:
Andre Klapper's Avatar
Posts: 1,665 | Thanked: 1,649 times | Joined on Jun 2008 @ Praha, Czech Republic
#20
Originally Posted by AapoRantalainen View Post
If 2.26 is working, is there any show stoppers for 2.33?
Note that 2.33 is an unstable release. I really do not recommend to ship that as API can change a lot.
__________________
maemo.org Bugmaster
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Andre Klapper For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:36.