Page 4 of 7 « First 23 4 56 Last »
Reply
Thread Tools
imaginaryenemy is offline imaginaryenemy
2016-06-27 , 04:51
Posts: 649 | Thanked: 762 times | Joined on Mar 2012 @ Ohio
#31
Originally Posted by sicelo View Post
Those saying VLC/Android can play while they do other tasks - yes, any phone (at least Nokia) with a music player can do that, even Nokia S40 (even the older versions such as in Nokia 6230i). This is clearly not the multitasking being referred to in this thread.
I don't think anyone would consider playing music in the background multitasking (though, I realize in the strictest sense it is). Since music is meant to be heard, not seen, if it couldn't be put into the background, I'm not sure many people would listen to music on their phones.

Playing VIDEOS in the background was only mentioned to demonstrate common misconceptions on multitasking on Android.

I agree, multitasking on mobile does not compare to multitasking on desktop. I just think the multitasking divide between Android and other more loved OSs is much smaller than many would like to think.




Sent from my XT1095 using Tapatalk
Last edited by imaginaryenemy; 2016-06-27 at 05:24.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to imaginaryenemy For This Useful Post:
beobachter's Avatar
beobachter is offline beobachter
2016-06-27 , 08:47
Posts: 46 | Thanked: 84 times | Joined on Aug 2011
#32
Hello, the closest You get to real multitasking on Android is the developer Android N version.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to beobachter For This Useful Post:
wicket's Avatar
wicket is offline wicket
2016-06-28 , 00:53
Posts: 634 | Thanked: 3,266 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Colombia
#33
Originally Posted by aegis View Post
If the app isn't doing anything then it saves state and releases resources saving your battery. It restores state back to where you left it when you resume it.
This is not true. If a process is idling in memory, it will not consume any additional power unless it is swapped out. Saving and restoring state requires copying data from RAM to non-volatile storage and back again. This action is similar to swapping and does consume extra power. When Android restarts an app from scratch and restores its state, it's quite likely that it uses more power due to extra instruction cycles and copy operations than swapping normally would.

Originally Posted by sicelo View Post
Finally, it's quite apparent that some of us, myself included, want the same type of multitasking as on a desktop, even though there might be a battery/power penalty to pay.
This is not entirely true either:

https://felipec.wordpress.com/2012/0...ic-vs-dynamic/
__________________
DebiaN900 - Native Debian on the N900. Deprecated in favour of Maemo Leste.

Maemo Leste for N950 and N9 (currently broken).
Devuan for N950 and N9.

Mobile devices with mainline Linux support - Help needed with documentation.

"Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly." - Henry Spencer
Last edited by wicket; 2016-06-28 at 05:48.
 

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to wicket For This Useful Post:
sicelo is offline sicelo
2016-06-28 , 06:26
Community Council | Posts: 680 | Thanked: 1,227 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Mbabane
#34
Originally Posted by wicket View Post
This is not true. If a process is idling in memory, it will not consume any additional power unless it is swapped out. Saving and restoring state requires copying data from RAM to non-volatile storage and back again. This action is similar to swapping and does consume extra power. When Android restarts an app from scratch and restores its state, it's quite likely that it uses more power due to extra instruction cycles and copy operations than swapping normally would.


This is not entirely true either:

https://felipec.wordpress.com/2012/0...ic-vs-dynamic/
Awesome. So those of us crying for 'real' multitasking aren't getting the worst deal after all

but then ... it could be that more recent android builds have overcome some of the issues raised on that post? I notice that was 2012.

Either way, I definitely like Maemo's multitasking better than anything else available on other mobile devices that I have had access to use/test.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sicelo For This Useful Post:
reinob is offline reinob
2016-06-28 , 06:49
Posts: 1,808 | Thanked: 4,272 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Germany
#35
Originally Posted by sicelo View Post
but then ... it could be that more recent android builds have overcome some of the issues raised on that post? I notice that was 2012.
AFAIK Android has taken the "easy" way of not adapting the kernel to the actual hardware (like Nokia did with the N900), which of course means that the power consumption is much higher. Their solution is then to freeze apps (swap out, swap back, restart, etc.)

In the old days people complained that Windows didn't have real multitasking (it had "cooperative multitasking"). Now (other, but still) people claim that Android has real multitasking. But we claim that on mobile only Maemo has real multitasking.

As long as each group uses whatever definition they wish, then we cannot sensibly argue about this. FWIW and in my book: Android does not have multitasking.
 

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to reinob For This Useful Post:
pichlo's Avatar
pichlo is offline pichlo
2016-06-28 , 06:55
Posts: 6,445 | Thanked: 20,981 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ UK
#36
Originally Posted by reinob View Post
FWIW and in my book: Android does not have multitasking.
Can you share a few pages from your book?

What we have established in this thread:
  • Android can run multiple processes simultaneously, as evidenced by running top or ps -aux.
  • (At least some versions of) Android can run multiple user applications simultaneously and give the user the multitasking experience.
What else is missing?
__________________
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post:
aegis is offline aegis
2016-06-28 , 08:04
Posts: 702 | Thanked: 2,059 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ UK
#37
Originally Posted by wicket View Post
This is not true. If a process is idling in memory, it will not consume any additional power unless it is swapped out. Saving and restoring state requires copying data from RAM to non-volatile storage and back again. This action is similar to swapping and does consume extra power. When Android restarts an app from scratch and restores its state, it's quite likely that it uses more power due to extra instruction cycles and copy operations than swapping normally would.
It is true.

Android first saves state IN RAM. IE. It just leaves an instance of the running app IN RAM. If it then runs out of RAM, it offloads that instance to storage.

Yes, it may use more instructions to restore state than to restore a swapped out process but you are getting the inbuilt protection of not having an app lose all its transient unsaved data.

Anyway, nobody wants their device to be continuously swapping. Nobody would argue that they'd rather have swapping for performance reasons.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aegis For This Useful Post:
aegis is offline aegis
2016-06-28 , 08:09
Posts: 702 | Thanked: 2,059 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ UK
#38
Originally Posted by reinob View Post

In the old days people complained that Windows didn't have real multitasking (it had "cooperative multitasking"). Now (other, but still) people claim that Android has real multitasking. But we claim that on mobile only Maemo has real multitasking.
That's a ridiculous analogy. You may as well claim that because Maemo has a terminal built in, it's closer to MS-DOS.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to aegis For This Useful Post:
Jordi's Avatar
Jordi is offline Jordi
2016-06-28 , 09:54
Posts: 400 | Thanked: 708 times | Joined on Jun 2011 @ Geneva - CH
#39
This is my use case of multitasking : I let run a gps tracking app during hours, sometimes up to 6-8 hours. Then I use (lightly) my phone for other tasks like answering a call, etc.

My experience is that Android does this as good as Meego or Sailfish, it usually consume about 5 to 7 percentage points of battery per hour (for a comparable battery), no gaps in the recording.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jordi For This Useful Post:
mscion is offline mscion
2016-06-28 , 11:51
Posts: 1,873 | Thanked: 4,529 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ North Potomac MD
#40
Android seems to do multitasking better than it used to. Used to be when Android killed an app, like a document editor, I would lose the changes I made. Now if the same app is killed it looks like the changes are saved. Whether that is due to an improvement in the app or android itself, I can't say for certain. Regardless, I wish it was me that decided whether the app is killed and not android. I would prefer, if the situation arises that there is no enough free memory to run an app, that the system tell me that I need to close some given set of apps or risk getting them killed. I would also prefer having a better swapping capability, even at the expense of performance, as the phones are pretty fast anyways. Regardless this may be a moot point once the phones have 6 to 8 gb.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mscion For This Useful Post:
Reply
Page 4 of 7 « First 23 4 56 Last »

Tags
gravity box

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:39.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top