Reply
Thread Tools
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#21
Originally Posted by qwerty12 View Post
I coded the 1st linooks virus:
#!/bin/sh
rm -rf /*
That's a trojan, not a virus.
 
Posts: 137 | Thanked: 71 times | Joined on Mar 2008
#22
Originally Posted by REDHUNTER View Post
Newbe question - Is there a anti virus program that can be dowloaded for use on this tablet?
open source (GPL) anti-virus
http://www.clamav.net
 
qwerty12's Avatar
Posts: 4,274 | Thanked: 5,358 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Looking at y'all and sighing
#23
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
That's a trojan, not a virus.
Arrh, fine then!
 
Posts: 187 | Thanked: 28 times | Joined on Apr 2007 @ Southampton, UK
#24
There are no viruses which are capable of self replicating onto other systems. The only anti virus software for linux exists to prevent virus infection on windows computers connected to the linux system.
__________________
There is no place like /home.
 
Posts: 422 | Thanked: 244 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#25
While I am not planning myself to use av on my nokia, this point is often overlooked.

The scenario is this - someone forwards an infected file to you. You are running linux, and so are unaware and unaffected by the virus. You forward the file on to your mother who has let her av updates lapse.

She opens the attachment because she trusts her children.

Who is responsible? The person who forwarded the email to you, your mother, or you? Pick any of these and then imagine explaining it to your mother.

Change the setting to one of business. You receive a doc from a business partner who has never heard of av. You forward it on to a customer who has also never heard of av. They are infected from the email you sent. Bam, they are not your customer any more.

A carrier of a virus is just as culpable as someone infected by one.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to paulkoan For This Useful Post:
Posts: 472 | Thanked: 107 times | Joined on Apr 2007 @ Texas
#26
Originally Posted by paulkoan View Post
While I am not planning myself to use av on my nokia, this point is often overlooked.

The scenario is this - someone forwards an infected file to you. You are running linux, and so are unaware and unaffected by the virus. You forward the file on to your mother who has let her av updates lapse.

She opens the attachment because she trusts her children.

Who is responsible? The person who forwarded the email to you, your mother, or you? Pick any of these and then imagine explaining it to your mother.

Change the setting to one of business. You receive a doc from a business partner who has never heard of av. You forward it on to a customer who has also never heard of av. They are infected from the email you sent. Bam, they are not your customer any more.

A carrier of a virus is just as culpable as someone infected by one.
The person who forwarded an attachment 1. from someone they didn't know 2. that they hadn't opened themselves are culpable.

Prevention is better than a cure.
__________________
Maemo-Guru.com for news, reviews, and walkthroughs
 
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#27
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
That's a trojan, not a virus.
It's not a trojan, either, as it doesn't purport to be other than distilled evil.
 
Posts: 422 | Thanked: 244 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#28
This sounds like a different scenario. Knowing someone doesn't remove the possibility they send you an infected file, and opening a file on a linux box that doesn't have an av scanner won't remove or notify you that there is a virus installed.

So now you have to explain to your customer why you sent them a virus infected file. I am sure they will accept your explanation of "I knew the person who sent me it and opened it in openoffice without issues".
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#29
Originally Posted by Benson View Post
It's not a trojan, either, as it doesn't purport to be other than distilled evil.
Well, for the sake of validating my argument, let's just say it's the postinst for a .deb called INSTALLTHISFORFREEGIRAFFEPORN.deb.
 
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#30
You're saying that doesn't purport to be distilled evil? Giraffe porn, all-Caps, looks like distilled evil from here...
 
Reply

Tags
770, antivirus, bora, chinook, diablo, fremantle, gregale, internet tablet os, itos, maemo, maemo 2, maemo 3, maemo 4, maemo 5, mistral, n800, n810, n900, os2005, os2006, os2007, os2008, scirocco, virus

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:45.